Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834563›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Susceptibility status of the wild-caught Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae), the sand fly vector of visceral leishmaniasis, to different insecticides in Nepal.

Lalita Roy, Surendra Uranw, Kristien Cloots, Tom Smekens, Usha Kiran, Uttam Raj Pyakurel, Murari Lal Das, Rajpal S Yadav, Wim Van Bortel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lalita RoyTropical and Infectious Disease Centre, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Surendra UranwDepartment of Internal Medicine, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Kristien ClootsDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tom SmekensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Usha KiranCommunicable Diseases Control Unit, World Health Organization Country Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Uttam Raj PyakurelEpidemiology and Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Murari Lal DasDepartment of Microbiology, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Rajpal S YadavDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wim Van BortelEntomology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEMinistry of Health and Population · NPWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) is targeted for elimination as a public health problem in Nepal by 2023. For nearly three decades, the core vector control intervention in Nepal has been indoor residual spraying (IRS) with pyrethroids. Considering the long-term use of pyrethroids and the possible development of resistance in the vector Phlebotomus argentipes sand flies, we monitored the susceptibility status of their field populations to the insecticides of different classes, in villages with and without IRS activities in recent years. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsSand flies were collected from villages with and without IRS in five VL endemic districts from August 2019 to November 2020. The WHO susceptibility test procedure was adopted using filter papers impregnated at the discriminating concentrations of insecticides of the following classes: pyrethroids (alpha-cypermethrin 0.05%, deltamethrin 0.05%, and lambda-cyhalothrin 0.05%), carbamates (bendiocarb 0.1%) and organophosphates (malathion 5%). Pyrethroid resistance intensity bioassays with papers impregnated with 5× of the discriminating concentrations, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) synergist-pyrethroid bioassays, and DDT cross-resistance bioassays were also performed. In the IRS villages, the vector sand flies were resistant (mortality rate <90%) to alpha-cypermethrin and possibly resistant (mortality rate 90-97%) to deltamethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin, while susceptibility to these insecticides was variable in the non-IRS villages. The vector was fully susceptible to bendiocarb and malathion in all villages. A delayed knockdown time (KDT50) with pyrethroids was observed in all villages. The pyrethroid resistance intensity was low, and the susceptibility improved at 5× of the discriminating concentrations. Enhanced pyrethroid susceptibility after pre-exposure to PBO and the DDT-pyrethroid cross-resistance were evident. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our investigation showed that P. argentipes sand flies have emerged with pyrethroid resistance, suggesting the need to switch to alternative classes of insecticides such as organophosphates for IRS. We strongly recommend the regular and systematic monitoring of insecticide resistance in sand flies to optimize the efficiency of vector control interventions to sustain VL elimination efforts in Nepal.

Indexed as

InsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralPhlebotomusPsychodidaePyrethrinsAnimalsDDTInsecticide ResistanceMalathionNepalDDTInsecticidesMalathionPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID35834563
PMCPMC9321455
OpenAlexW4285495575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.