Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Local hyperexcitability of C-nociceptors may predict responsiveness to topical lidocaine in neuropathic pain.

Gunther Landmann, Lenka Stockinger, Benjamin Gerber, Justus Benrath, Martin Schmelz, Roman Rukwied

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Nociceptor Primary Cilium Contributes to Mechanical Nociceptive Threshold and Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting sensory neuron GPCRs for peripheral neuropathic pain.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gunther LandmannCentre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Lenka StockingerCentre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Benjamin GerberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Justus BenrathDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin SchmelzDepartment of Experimental Pain Research, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roman RukwiedDepartment of Experimental Pain Research, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4118-497X
Heidelberg University · DESwiss Paraplegic Center · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored whether increased C-nociceptor excitability predicts analgesic effects of topical lidocaine in 33 patients with mono- (n = 15) or poly-neuropathy (n = 18). Excitability of C-nociceptors was tested by transcutaneous electrical sinusoidal (4 Hz) and half sine wave (single 500 ms pulse) stimulation delivered to affected and non-affected sites. Analgesic effects of 24 hrs topical lidocaine were recorded. About 50% of patients reported increased pain from symptomatic skin upon continuous 4 Hz sinusoidal and about 25% upon 500 ms half sine wave stimulation. Electrically-evoked half sine wave pain correlated to their clinical pain level (r = 0.37, p < 0.05). Lidocaine-patches reduced spontaneous pain by >1-point NRS in 8 of 28 patients (p < 0.0001, ANOVA). Patients with increased pain to 2.5 sec sinusoidal stimulation at 0.2 and 0.4 mA intensity had significantly stronger analgesic effects of lidocaine and in reverse, patients with a pain reduction of >1 NRS had significantly higher pain ratings to continuous 1 min supra-threshold sinusoidal stimulation. In the assessed control skin areas of the patients, enhanced pain upon 1 min 4 Hz stimulation correlated to increased depression scores (HADS). Electrically assessed C-nociceptor excitability identified by slowly depolarizing electrical stimuli might reflect the source of neuropathic pain in some patients and can be useful for patient stratification to predict potential success of topical analgesics. Central neuronal circuitry assessment reflected by increased pain in control skin associated with higher HADS scores suggest central sensitization phenomena in a sub-population of neuropathic pain patients.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaNociceptorsAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalHumansLidocainePain MeasurementAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID35834539
PMCPMC9282664
OpenAlexW4285389639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.