Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834536›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Metagenomic analysis of the dynamical conversion of photosynthetic bacterial communities in different crop fields over different growth periods.

Ju-E Cheng, Pin Su, Zhan-Hong Zhang, Li-Min Zheng, Zhong-Yong Wang, Muhammad Rizwan Hamid, Jian-Ping Dai, Xiao-Hua Du, Li-Jie Chen, Zhong-Ying Zhai and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ju-E ChengCollege of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Pin SuCollege of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Zhan-Hong ZhangHunan Vegetable Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, China.
Li-Min ZhengHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Zhong-Yong WangHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Muhammad Rizwan HamidHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Jian-Ping DaiHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Xiao-Hua DuHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Li-Jie ChenHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Zhong-Ying ZhaiHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Xiao-Ting KongHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Yong LiuHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
De-Yong ZhangHunan Hybrid Rice Research Center, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-0252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthetic bacteria are beneficial to plants, but knowledge of photosynthetic bacterial community dynamics in field crops during different growth stages is scarce. The factors controlling the changes in the photosynthetic bacterial community during plant growth require further investigation. In this study, 35 microbial community samples were collected from the seedling, flowering, and mature stages of tomato, cucumber, and soybean plants. 35 microbial community samples were assessed using Illumina sequencing of the photosynthetic reaction center subunit M (pufM) gene. The results revealed significant alpha diversity and community structure differences among the three crops at the different growth stages. Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum, and Methylobacterium, Roseateles, and Thiorhodococcus were the dominant genera at all growth stages. PCoA revealed clear differences in the structure of the microbial populations isolated from leaf samples collected from different crops at different growth stages. In addition, a dissimilarity test revealed significant differences in the photosynthetic bacterial community among crops and growth stages (P<0.05). The photosynthetic bacterial communities changed during crop growth. OTUs assigned to Methylobacterium were present in varying abundances among different sample types, which we speculated was related to the function of different Methylobacterium species in promoting plant growth development and enhancing plant photosynthetic efficiency. In conclusion, the dynamics observed in this study provide new research ideas for the detailed assessments of the relationship between photosynthetic bacteria and different growth stages of plants.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsMicrobiotaBacteriaCrops, AgriculturalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID35834536
PMCPMC9282544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.