Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834525›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Quality of life and health status in older adults (≥65 years) up to five years following colorectal cancer treatment: Findings from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) cohort study.

Amanda Cummings, Rebecca Foster, Lynn Calman, Natalia V Permyakova, Jackie Bridges, Theresa Wiseman, Teresa Corbett, Peter W F Smith, Claire Foster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Associations of frailty with symptoms, and HRQOL in older cancer survivors after cancer treatments: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Health-related quality of life trajectories in older adult long-term survivors of colorectal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda CummingsMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-2774
Rebecca FosterMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9320-4269
Lynn CalmanMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Natalia V PermyakovaSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jackie BridgesNIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Theresa WisemanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3355-1269
Teresa CorbettFaculty of Sport, Health, & Social Sciences, Solent University, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Peter W F SmithSocial Statistics and Demography, Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Claire FosterMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthampton Solent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged ≥65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (QoL) and health status in the five years following CRC treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsCREW is a UK longitudinal cohort study investigating factors associated with health and wellbeing recovery following curative-intent CRC surgery. Participants completed self-report questionnaires pre-surgery, then at least annually up to five years. Longitudinal analyses explored the prevalence and pre-surgery risk factors of poor QoL (QLACS-GSS) and health status (EQ-5D: presence/absence of problems in five domains) in older (≥65 years) participants over five years.

results501 participants aged ≥65years completed questionnaires pre-surgery; 45% completed questionnaires five years later. Oldest-old participants (≥80 years) reported poorer QoL (18% higher QLACS-GSS) and 2-4 times higher odds of having problems with mobility or usual activities, compared with the youngest-old (65-69 years) over follow-up. Baseline higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with better QoL (10-30% lower QLACS-GSS scores compared to those with low self-efficacy) and lower odds of problems in all EQ-5D domains. Adequate social support was significantly associated with better QoL (8% lower QLACS-GSS) and lower odds of problems with usual activities (OR = 0.62) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.56).

conclusionThere are important differences in QoL and health status outcomes for the oldest-old during CRC recovery. CREW reveals pre-surgery risk factors that are amenable to intervention including self-efficacy and social support.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35834525
PMCPMC9282586
OpenAlexW4285390249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.