Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834524›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Portable wireless and fibreless fNIRS headband compares favorably to a stationary headcap-based system.

Christopher L Friesen, Michael Lawrence, Tony G J Ingram, Megan M Smith, Eric A Hamilton, Christopher W Holland, Heather F Neyedli, Shaun G Boe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. System Derived Spatial-Temporal CNN for High-Density fNIRS BCI.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher L FriesenLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Michael LawrenceLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tony G J IngramLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Megan M SmithAxem Neurotechnology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Eric A HamiltonAxem Neurotechnology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Christopher W HollandDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada.
Heather F NeyedliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shaun G BoeLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-0049
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's purpose is to characterize the performance of a prototype functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) headband meant to enable quick and easy measurements from the sensorimotor cortices. The fact that fNIRS is well-suited to ergonomic designs (i.e., their ability to be made wireless, their relative robustness to movement artifacts among other characteristics) has resulted in many recent examples of novel ergonomic fNIRS systems; however, the optical nature of fNIRS measurement presents an inherent challenge to measurement at areas of the brain underlying haired parts of the head. It is for this reason that the majority of ergonomic fNIRS systems that have been developed to date target the prefrontal cortex. In the present study we compared the performance of a novel, portable fNIRS headband compared with a stationary full headcap fNIRS system to measure sensorimotor activity during simple upper- and lower-extremity tasks, in healthy individuals >50 years of age. Both fNIRS systems demonstrated the expected pattern of hemodynamic activity in both upper- and lower-extremity tasks, and a comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio between the two systems suggests the prototype fNIRS headband is non-inferior to a full head cap fNIRS system regarding the ability to detect a physiological response at the sensorimotor cortex during these tasks. These results suggest the use of a wireless and fibreless fNIRS design is feasible for measurement at the sensorimotor cortex.

Indexed as

Sensorimotor CortexSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredArtifactsHumansMovementPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID35834524
PMCPMC9282617
OpenAlexW4285386405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.