Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834506›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Period poverty: The perceptions and experiences of impoverished women living in an inner-city area of Northwest England.

Madeleine Boyers, Supriya Garikipati, Alice Biggane, Elizabeth Douglas, Nicola Hawkes, Ciara Kiely, Cheryl Giddings, Julie Kelly, Diane Exley, Penelope A Phillips-Howard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Period poverty, housing and food insecurity, and mental health among college students in Hawai'i.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Menstrual Equity: A Survey Study with ZIP-Code Level Analysis.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Period Poverty: A Neglected Public Health Issue.Korean journal of family medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Madeleine BoyersDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.
Supriya GarikipatiUniversity of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, England.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-8227
Alice BigganeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.
Elizabeth DouglasThe Whitechapel Centre, Liverpool, England.
Nicola HawkesSouth Liverpool Foodbank, Liverpool, England.
Ciara KielyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.
Cheryl GiddingsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.
Julie KellyAdelaide House, Liverpool, England.
Diane ExleyBrownlow Health, Liverpool, England.
Penelope A Phillips-HowardDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.
Linda MasonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-9261

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100677Medical Research Council MR/N006046/1Medical Research Council MR/T04036X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe menstrual needs of girls and women are important to health, education, and well-being. Unmet need and harm from poor menstrual health in low-and- middle-income countries have been documented, but with little empirical research undertaken in high income countries. Continuing austerity in the UK suggests menstruators are likely more vulnerable to 'period poverty' than previously, with the COVID-19 pandemic assumed to exacerbate the situation.

aimTo explore the menstrual experiences and perceptions of women in the UK who are living under circumstances of deprivation, alongside views of staff working in organisations supporting these women, to understand whether women's menstrual needs are met.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted in an inner-city in NW England. Three focus group discussions and 14 in-depth interviews were conducted across three study sites supporting impoverished women. Data was analysed thematically.

resultsThemes were: reflections on menstruation; affordability of products; access to public facilities; organisational support; potential solutions. Many women perceived menstruation as a burden in three aspects: physical discomfort and pain; psychological anxiety; and shame and stigma. Managing menstruation was difficult due to cost relative to low incomes, with food, heating and lighting prioritised, leaving women improvising with materials or wearing products for longer than desired. Most suggested that products should be free, often remarking if men required similar items this would happen. Most women were unaware supporting organisations provided free products. Staff felt the small range of products offered did not meet client needs and were ill-prepared to have conversations on products and clients' menstrual needs.

conclusionImpoverished women lack the necessary resources to manage their menses well which negatively impacts their health and brings stress, embarrassment, and shame. Support, including access to free products, is needed at both local and national level to help impoverished women manage their menstrual hygiene.

Indexed as

COVID-19MenstruationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHygieneMalePandemicsPoverty

Identifiers

PMID35834506
PMCPMC9282460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.