ArticlePloS one2022
Comparative study of the unbinding process of some HTLV-1 protease inhibitors using unbiased molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The challenge of HTLV-1 therapeutics: lessons from anti-protease approaches.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The HTLV-1 protease is one of the major antiviral targets to overwhelm this virus. Several research groups have developed protease inhibitors, but none has been successful. In this regard, developing new HTLV-1 protease inhibitors to fix the defects in previous inhibitors may overcome the lack of curative treatment for this oncovirus. Thus, we decided to study the unbinding pathways of the most potent (compound 10, PDB ID 4YDF, Ki = 15 nM) and one of the weakest (compound 9, PDB ID 4YDG, Ki = 7900 nM) protease inhibitors, which are very structurally similar. We conducted 12 successful short and long simulations (totaling 14.8 μs) to unbind the compounds from two monoprotonated (mp) forms of protease using the Supervised Molecular Dynamics (SuMD) without applying any biasing force. The results revealed that Asp32 or Asp32' in the two forms of mp state similarly exert powerful effects on maintaining both potent and weak inhibitors in the binding pocket of HTLV-1 protease. In the potent inhibitor's unbinding process, His66' was a great supporter that was absent in the weak inhibitor's unbinding pathway. In contrast, in the weak inhibitor's unbinding process, Trp98/Trp98' by pi-pi stacking interactions were unfavorable for the stability of the inhibitor in the binding site. In our opinion, these results will assist in designing more potent and effective inhibitors for the HTLV-1 protease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.