Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834425›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023

Retrospective motion correction in foetal MRI for clinical applications: existing methods, applications and integration into clinical practice.

Alena U Uus, Alexia Egloff Collado, Thomas A Roberts, Joseph V Hajnal, Mary A Rutherford, Maria Deprez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Offline ultrasound-MRI fusion imaging for assessment of normal fetal brain development.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automated Craniofacial Biometry with 3D T2w Fetal MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Advances in Fetal Brain Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  19. Total and Regional Brain Volumes in Fetuses With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alena U UusDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Alexia Egloff ColladoCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas A RobertsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph V HajnalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Mary A RutherfordCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Maria DeprezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102431Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foetal MRI is a complementary imaging method to antenatal ultrasound. It provides advanced information for detection and characterisation of foetal brain and body anomalies. Even though modern single shot sequences allow fast acquisition of 2D slices with high in-plane image quality, foetal MRI is intrinsically corrupted by motion. Foetal motion leads to loss of structural continuity and corrupted 3D volumetric information in stacks of slices. Furthermore, the arbitrary and constantly changing position of the foetus requires dynamic readjustment of acquisition planes during scanning.

Indexed as

FetusMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMotionPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35834425
PMCPMC7614695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.