Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834334›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2022

Language-agnostic pharmacovigilant text mining to elicit side effects from clinical notes and hospital medication records.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Davide Placido, Cristina Leal Rodríguez, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Simona Gentile, Anna Pors Nielsen, Søren Brunak, Gesche Jürgens, Stig Ejdrup Andersen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-HansenClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-0371
Davide PlacidoNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8838
Cristina Leal RodríguezNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-0630
Hans-Christian Thorsen-MeyerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-3089
Simona GentileDepartment of Radiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-2865
Anna Pors NielsenNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren BrunakNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gesche JürgensClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-8118
Stig Ejdrup AndersenClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-4720
University of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark 5153-00002BNovo Nordisk Foundation NNF14CC0001Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF17OC0027594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to craft a drug safety signalling pipeline associating latent information in clinical free text with exposures to single drugs and drug pairs. Data arose from 12 secondary and tertiary public hospitals in two Danish regions, comprising approximately half the Danish population. Notes were operationalised with a fastText embedding, based on which we trained 10 270 neural-network models (one for each distinct single-drug/drug-pair exposure) predicting the risk of exposure given an embedding vector. We included 2 905 251 admissions between May 2008 and June 2016, with 13 740 564 distinct drug prescriptions; the median number of prescriptions was 5 (IQR: 3-9) and in 1 184 340 (41%) admissions patients used ≥5 drugs concomitantly. A total of 10 788 259 clinical notes were included, with 179 441 739 tokens retained after pruning. Of 345 single-drug signals reviewed, 28 (8.1%) represented possibly undescribed relationships; 186 (54%) signals were clinically meaningful. Sixteen (14%) of the 115 drug-pair signals were possible interactions, and two (1.7%) were known. In conclusion, we built a language-agnostic pipeline for mining associations between free-text information and medication exposure without manual curation, predicting not the likely outcome of a range of exposures but also the likely exposures for outcomes of interest. Our approach may help overcome limitations of text mining methods relying on curated data in English and can help leverage non-English free text for pharmacovigilance.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNatural Language ProcessingData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHospitalsHumansLanguagedata miningmachine learningpharmacovigilancesafety signal detectionsafety signal refinement

Identifiers

PMID35834334
PMCPMC9541191
OpenAlexW4285390153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.