ArticleJAMA network open2022
Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Video Review.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Capsule Endoscopy for Detection of Small Bowel Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Pooled it
- Improved Efficiency and Lesion Detection in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Using the Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Model SEE-AI.DEN open · 2027Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparing artificial intelligence and healthcare professional performance in surgical and interventional video analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Recent technological advances in video capsule endoscopy: a comprehensive review.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- AI-Assisted Double-Headed Capsule Endoscopy: Multicentre Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study Across Small Bowel Indications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Localization of Small Bowel Anatomic Transition Zones in Crohn's Disease Using Capsule Endoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in the detection and characterization of gastrointestinal premalignant and early malignant lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Review
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: A Review of Market-Available Tools for Clinical Practice.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Unmet Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Conventional small-bowel capsule endoscopy reading vs proprietary artificial intelligence auxiliary systems: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Review
- Advances in pediatric video capsule endoscopy: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Impact of human and artificial intelligence collaboration on workload reduction in medical image interpretation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Establishing an AI model and application for automated capsule endoscopy recognition based on convolutional neural networks (with video).BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of real-time artificial intelligence-aid endoscopic ultrasonography diagnostic system in discriminating gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas: a multicenter diagnostic study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Computed tomography-based prediction of pancreatitis following biliary metal stent placement with the convolutional neural network.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Preliminary Evidence of the Use of Generative AI in Health Care Clinical Services: Systematic Narrative Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Review
- Enhanced accuracy for classification of video capsule endoscopy images using multiple deep learning convolutional neural networks.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Conference Report: The FutuRE oF MinimalLy InvasivE GI and Capsule DiagnosTics (REFLECT) Nyborg, Denmark, October 2023.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Reading small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) videos is a tedious task for clinicians, and a new method should be applied to solve the situation. Objectives: To develop and evaluate the performance of a convolutional neural network algorithm for SBCE video review in real-life clinical care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter, retrospective diagnostic study, a deep learning neural network (SmartScan) was trained and validated for the SBCE video review. A total of 2927 SBCE examinations from 29 medical centers were used to train SmartScan to detect 17 types of CE structured terminology (CEST) findings from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. SmartScan was later validated with conventional reading (CR) and SmartScan-assisted reading (SSAR) in 2898 SBCE examinations collected from 22 medical centers. Data analysis was performed from January 25 to December 31, 2021. Exposure: An artificial intelligence-based tool for interpreting clinical images of SBCE. Main Outcomes and Measures: The detection rate and efficiency of CEST findings detected by SSAR and CR were compared. Results: A total of 5825 SBCE examinations were retrospectively collected; 2898 examinations (1765 male participants [60.9%]; mean [SD] age, 49.8 [15.5] years) were included in the validation phase. From a total of 6084 CEST-classified SB findings, SSAR detected 5834 findings (95.9%; 95% CI, 95.4%-96.4%), significantly higher than CR, which detected 4630 findings (76.1%; 95% CI, 75.0%-77.2%). SmartScan-assisted reading achieved a higher per-patient detection rate (79.3% [2298 of 2898]) for CEST findings compared with CR (70.7% [2048 of 2298]; 95% CI, 69.0%-72.3%). With SSAR, the mean (SD) number of images (per SBCE video) requiring review was reduced to 779.2 (337.2) compared with 27 910.8 (12 882.9) with CR, for a mean (SD) reduction rate of 96.1% (4.3%). The mean (SD) reading time with SSAR was shortened to 5.4 (1.5) minutes compared with CR (51.4 [11.6] minutes), for a mean (SD) reduction rate of 89.3% (3.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that a convolutional neural network-based algorithm is associated with an increased detection rate of SBCE findings and reduced SBCE video reading time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.