Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834248›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Manali I Patel, Jacqueline M Ferguson, Eida Castro, Cristina D Pereira-Estremera, Guillermo N Armaiz-Peña, Ysabel Duron, Fay Hlubocky, Analynn Infantado, Bles Nuqui, Donna Julian and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hospital-based gastric cancer outcomes in the United States (2003-2022): racial and regional disparities.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Manali I PatelDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jacqueline M FergusonMedical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Eida CastroDepartment of Psychology, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico.
Cristina D Pereira-EstremeraBattle Creek Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Clinical Neuropsychology Clinic, Battle Creek, Michigan.
Guillermo N Armaiz-PeñaDepartment of Psychology, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico.
Ysabel DuronThe Latino Cancer Institute, San Jose, California.
Fay HlubockyDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Analynn InfantadoSt Peter's Health Partners Cancer Care, Albany, New York.
Bles NuquiSt Peter's Health Partners Cancer Care, Albany, New York.
Donna JulianSt Peter's Health Partners Cancer Care, Albany, New York.
Nii NorteySt Peter's Health Partners Cancer Care, Albany, New York.
Alexandra SteckSt Peter's Health Partners Cancer Care, Albany, New York.
Melissa BondyDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Shail MaingiDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
HealthPartners · USStanford University · USPonce Health Sciences University · PRBattle Creek VA Medical Center · USCancerCare · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USLatino Health Institute (United States) · USSt Peter's Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Post-Hurricane Cancer Care: Patient Needs after Hurricane MariaR21MD013674 · NIMHD · PONCE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CASTRO, EIDA MARIA, JIM, HEATHER S.L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Reducing Disparities in End of Life Cancer CareK23MD013474 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, MANALI I · 2018 to 2020
$502k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD013474NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD013674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The full effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care disparities, particularly by race and ethnicity, remains unknown. Objectives: To assess whether the race and ethnicity of patients with cancer was associated with disparities in cancer treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, and concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national survey study of US adults with cancer compared treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity from September 1, 2020, to January 12, 2021. Exposures: The COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was delay in cancer treatment by race and ethnicity. Secondary outcomes were duration of delay, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information. Results: Of 1639 invited respondents, 1240 participated (75.7% response rate) from 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and 5 US territories (744 female respondents [60.0%]; median age, 60 years [range, 24-92 years]; 266 African American or Black [hereafter referred to as Black] respondents [21.5%]; 186 Asian respondents [15.0%]; 232 Hispanic or Latinx [hereafter referred to as Latinx] respondents [18.7%]; 29 American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or multiple races [hereafter referred to as other] respondents [2.3%]; and 527 White respondents [42.5%]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (odds ratio [OR], 6.13 [95% CI, 3.50-10.74]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.49-5.14]) had greater odds of involuntary treatment delays, and Black respondents had greater odds of treatment delays greater than 4 weeks (OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.11-8.81]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (OR, 4.32 [95% CI, 2.65-7.04]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 6.13 [95% CI, 3.57-10.53]) had greater odds of food insecurity and concerns regarding food security (Black respondents: OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.34-3.04]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.94 [95% CI, [1.86-4.66]), financial stability (Black respondents: OR, 3.56 [95% CI, 1.79-7.08]; Latinx respondents: OR, 4.29 [95% CI, 1.98-9.29]), and affordability of cancer treatment (Black respondents: OR, 4.27 [95% CI, 2.20-8.28]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.81 [95% CI, 1.48-5.36]). Trusted sources of COVID-19 information varied significantly by race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey of US adults with cancer, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with treatment delay disparities and adverse social and economic effects among Black and Latinx adults. Partnering with trusted sources may be an opportunity to overcome such disparities.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAdultBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35834248
PMCPMC9284331
OpenAlexW4285387472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.