Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834204›Full record

Observational studyRehabilitation psychology2022

Active or passive pain coping: Which predicts daily physical and psychosocial functioning in people with chronic pain and spinal cord injury?

Duygu Kuzu, Samsuk Kim, Anna L Kratz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rehabilitation psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duygu KuzuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.ORCID 0000-0002-1134-1551
Samsuk KimDepartment of Psychology.
Anna L KratzDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Funding

ACL HHS 90ARCP0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectiveDespite medical and psychotherapeutic treatments, chronic pain is one of the most challenging and disabling conditions for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). A growing body of research has demonstrated that pain coping strategies are effective for the adjustment of pain. However, we still lack an understanding of how passive pain coping and active pain coping relate to daily physical and psychosocial functioning for people with chronic pain and SCI. The current study used end-of-day (EOD) diary data to examine associations of passive and active pain coping with same-day independence, positive affect and well-being, social participation, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and pain interference in adults with chronic pain and SCI. RESEARCH METHOD/

designThis observational study in

resultsResults of multilevel modeling showed that, beyond the effects of key demographic variables, clinical variables (e.g., time since injury, mobility) and daily pain intensity, increased daily passive coping (from that person's average) related to increased same-day depressive symptoms ( CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Behavioral interventions for pain often emphasize adoption and practice of new active coping strategies. Findings highlight the potential importance of also addressing passive coping strategies in services of improvement in physical and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with chronic pain and SCI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Chronic PainSpinal Cord InjuriesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPsychosocial FunctioningSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35834204
PMCPMC10518854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.