Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834200›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2023

Self-relevant appeals to engage in self-monitoring of alcohol use: A microrandomized trial.

Stephanie M Carpenter, Jamie Yap, Megan E Patrick, Nicole Morrell, John J Dziak, Daniel Almirall, Carolyn Yoon, Inbal Nahum-Shani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03930524 (An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03930524 nacompletednot on this map

An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled891ConditionsCollege Student DrinkingArmsPersonalized Normative Feedback (PNF), Self-Monitoring (SM), Web-BASICS, Health Promotion Consultation, M-Bridge Online Health Coach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Momentary mindfulness versus distraction coping messages to reduce cannabis craving among young adults: A microrandomized trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Towards the Science of Engagement with Digital Interventions.Current directions in psychological science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie M CarpenterInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-4523-7565
Jamie YapInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-0899-7146
Megan E PatrickInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-3594-4944
Nicole MorrellCenter for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
John J DziakEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-5495
Daniel AlmirallInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9697-6600
Carolyn YoonStephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-5529-7708
Inbal Nahum-ShaniInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-9089
University of Michigan · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LINDA M COLLINS, SUSAN A MURPHY · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
Novel Methods for Intensive Longitudinal Data in SMART Studies of Drug Abuse and HIVR01DA039901 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALMIRALL, DANIEL, NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
Novel use of mHealth data to identify states of vulnerability and receptivity to JITAIs SupplementU01CA229437 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE, WETTER, DAVID W · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition from Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol UseR01AA026574 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PATRICK, MEGAN E. · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
National Institutes of Health; National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug AbuseNCI NIH HHS U01 CA229437NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026574NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile self-monitoring can help mitigate alcohol misuse in young adults, engagement with digital self-monitoring is suboptimal. The present study investigates the utility of two types of digital prompts (reminders) to encourage young adults to self-monitor their alcohol use. These prompts leverage information that is self-relevant (i.e., represents and is valuable) to the person.

methodFive hundred ninety-one college students (

resultsThe self-interest (vs. prosocial) prompt was significantly more effective in promoting proximal self-monitoring at the beginning of the study, Est = exp(.14) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.01, 1.29], whereas the prosocial (vs. self-interest) prompt was significantly more effective at the end, Est = exp(-.17) = 0.84; 95% CI [0.70, 0.98]. Further, the prosocial (vs. self-interest) prompt was significantly more effective among participants who previously allocated all their reward points to drawings for their preferred item, Est = exp(-.15) = 0.86; 95% CI [.75, .97].

conclusionsThese results suggest that the advantage of prompts that appeal to a person's self-interest (vs. prosocial) motives varies over time and based on what reward options participants prioritized in previous decisions. Theoretical and practical implications for intervention design are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingEthanolAdolescentFemaleHumansStudentsYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID35834200
PMCPMC9843482
OpenAlexW4285494631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.