Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834109›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2022

Management of cutaneous melanoma: radiologists challenging and risk assessment.

Vincenza Granata, Igino Simonetti, Roberta Fusco, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Francesco Izzo, Luigi Scarpato, Vito Vanella, Lucia Festino, Ester Simeone, Paolo Antonio Ascierto and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vincenza GranataRadiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy. v.granata@istitutotumori.na.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-3221
Igino SimonettiRadiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, Naples, Italy.
Sergio Venanzio SetolaRadiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Francesco IzzoHepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia",, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Luigi ScarpatoDepartment of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Vito VanellaDepartment of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Lucia FestinoDepartment of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Ester SimeoneDepartment of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoDepartment of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Antonella PetrilloRadiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma patient remains a challenging for the radiologist, due to the difficulty related to the management of a patient more often in an advanced stage of the disease. It is necessary to determine a stratification of risk, optimizing the means, with diagnostic tools that should be optimized in relation to the type of patient, and improving knowledge. Staging and risk assessment procedures are determined by disease presentation at diagnosis. Melanoma staging is a critical tool to assist clinical decision-making and prognostic assessment. It is used for clinical trial design, eligibility, stratification, and analysis. The current standard for regional lymph nodes staging is represented by the sentinel lymph node excision biopsy procedure. For staging of distant metastases, PET-CT has the highest sensitivity and diagnostic odds ratio. Similar trend is observed during melanoma surveillance. The advent of immunotherapy, which has improved patient outcome, however, has determined new issues for radiologists, partly due to atypical response patterns, partly due to adverse reactions that must be identified as soon as possible for the correct management of the patient. The main objectives of the new ir-criteria are to standardize the assessment between different trials. However, these ir-criteria do not take into account all cases of atypical response patterns, as hyperprogression or dissociated responses. None of these criteria has actually been uniformly adopted in routine. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can involve various organs from head to toe. It is crucial for radiologists to know the imaging appearances of this condition, to exclude recurrent or progressive disease and for pneumonitis, since it could be potentially life-threatening toxicity, resulting in pneumonitis-related deaths in early phase trials, to allow a proper patient management.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiologistsRisk AssessmentCTHigh-frequency ultrasoundImmune-related adverse eventsMelanomaMRIPET-CTRisk assessmentTreatment response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.