ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022
Improved delivery of Mcl-1 and survivin siRNA combination in breast cancer cells with additive siRNA complexes.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breakthroughs in the nanoparticle-mediated delivery of siRNA for breast cancer treatment.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- In Vitro Efficacy of PEI-Derived Lipopolymers in Silencing of Toxic Proteins in a Neuronal Model of Huntington's Disease.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Lipopolymers as the Basis of Non-Viral Delivery of Therapeutic siRNA Nanoparticles in a Leukemia (MOLM-13) Model.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Lipopolymer/siRNA Nanoparticles Targeting the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5A Disrupts Proliferation of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Designing Nanomedicines for Breast Cancer Therapy.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Safe and Effective Delivery of mRNA Using Modified PEI-Based Lipopolymers.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- siRNA Functionalized Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) in Management of Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed at investigating the influence of commercial transfection reagents (Prime-Fect, Leu-Fect A, and Leu-Fect C) complexed with different siRNAs (CDC20, HSP90, Mcl-1 and Survivin) in MDA-MB-436 breast cancer cells and the impact of incorporating an anionic additive, Trans-Booster, into siRNA formulations for improving in vitro gene silencing and delivery efficiency. Gene silencing was quantitatively analyzed by real-time RT-PCR while cell proliferation and siRNA uptake were evaluated by the MTT assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Amongst the investigated siRNAs and transfection reagents, Mcl-1/Prime-Fect complexes showed the highest inhibition of cell viability and the most effective siRNA delivery. The effect of various formulations on transfection efficiency showed that the additive with 1:1 ratio with siRNA was optimal achieving the lowest cell viability compared to untreated cells and negative control siRNA treatment (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of Mcl-1 and survivin siRNA suppressed the growth of MDA-MB-436 cells more effectively than treatment with the single siRNAs and resulted in cell viability as low as ~ 20% (vs. non-treated cells). This aligned well with the induction of apoptosis as analyzed by flow cytometry, which revealed higher apoptotic cells with the combination treatment group. We conclude that commercial transfection reagents formulated with Mcl-1/Survivin siRNA combination could serve as a potent anti-proliferation agent in the treatment of breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.