Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35834004›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2023

[Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version].

David Hohenschurz-Schmidt, Whitney Scott, Charlie Park, Georgios Christopoulos, Steven Vogel, Jerry Draper-Rodi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Intersection of Sarcopenia and Musculoskeletal Pain: Addressing Interconnected Challenges in Aging Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David Hohenschurz-SchmidtDepartment, Surgery and Cancer, Pain Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, 4th Floor, 369 Fulham Road, SW10 9NH, London, Großbritannien. d.hohenschurz-schmidt19@imperial.ac.uk.
Whitney ScottPsychology Department, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, Großbritannien.
Charlie ParkIPRS Triage and Remote Management Team, IPRS Health Limited, Little Blakenham, Suffolk, Großbritannien.
Georgios ChristopoulosFirst Contact Practitioner, MSc Neuromusculoskeletal Care, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, HCPC CSP, Staffordshire, Großbritannien.
Steven VogelResearch Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien.
Jerry Draper-RodiResearch Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien.
University College of Osteopathy · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRemote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations.

objectivesThis Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain.

methodsRecommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience.

resultsThe technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication.

conclusionThis Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainRemote ConsultationHumansExerciseManual therapyMusculoskeletal painPhysiotherapyPsychologyTelehealthVideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID35834004
PMCPMC9281242
OpenAlexW4285386689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.