Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833993›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2023

Mental health status of adolescents after family confinement during the COVID-19 outbreak in the general population: a longitudinal survey.

Miao Qu, Kun Yang, Yujia Cao, Mei Hong Xiu, Xiang Yang Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insight into the long-term psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. New findings on attention/hyperactivity disorder: what is (not) known?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miao Qu *Neurology Department, Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kun Yang *Evidence-Based Department, Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yujia CaoNeurology Department, Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mei Hong XiuPeking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Changping District, Beijing, 100096, China. xiumeihong97@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-8429
Xiang Yang ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China. zhangxy@psych.ac.cn.
Xuan Wu Hospital of the Capital Medical University · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNPeking University · CNShandong Institute of Automation · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have examined the psychological impact on adolescents of family confinement and infection exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, these surveys lacked follow-up data to determine how the family confinement affects participants' depression and anxiety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychological status and related risk and protective factors of adolescents after two months of family confinement for preventing COVID-19 in China, and compare them with baseline data. We surveyed teenagers in January 2020 before the COVID-19 outbreak (T1) and after home confinement (T2). We used the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) Scale and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). 13,637 valid questionnaires were collected at T1, of which 22.34% reported depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) and 14.42% reported anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 ≥ 10). At T2, the rates decreased to 14.86 and 7.44%, respectively (all P < 0.0001). Of the adolescents, 223 reported potential risk of exposure to COVID-19. We then compared them to the 9639 non-risk adolescents using a propensity score matching analysis. The adolescents with potential exposure risk had higher rates of depression (26.91 vs 15.32%, P = 0.0035) and anxiety (14.80 vs 7.21%, P = 0.01) than risk-free adolescents. Among adolescents with an exposure risk, psychological resilience was protective in preventing depression and anxiety symptoms, while emotional abuse, a poor parent-child relationship were risk factors. Long-term home confinement had minimal psychological impact on adolescents, but COVID-19 infection rates accounted for 50% of the variance in depression and anxiety among adolescents even with low community rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAnxietyChinaDepressionDisease OutbreaksHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AdolescentsAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionFamily confinementMental health

Identifiers

PMID35833993
PMCPMC9281280
OpenAlexW4285386952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.