Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833975›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Anatomical fracture endoprosthesis-who and how?]

Florian Freislederer, Raphael Trefzer, Stephan Radzanowski, Fabrizio Moro, Markus Scheibel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Florian FreisledererSchulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz. florian.freislederer@kws.ch.
Raphael TrefzerSchulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz.
Stephan RadzanowskiSchulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz.
Fabrizio MoroSchulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz.
Markus ScheibelSchulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz.
Schulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review article is to present the indications for an anatomical fracture prosthesis, mostly as a shoulder hemiprosthesis (SHEP) and its value in comparison to other procedures. The healing of the tuberosities in the anatomical position and an intact rotator cuff are particularly important for the successful implantation of a SHEP after proximal humeral fractures. For older patients (> 70 years), the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves more reliable results and is associated with a lower revision rate. The indications for implantation of a SHEP in non-reconstructible proximal humeral fractures, usually with a head split, should be carefully considered and can be used in cases with well-preserved large tuberosities and in younger patients. Complications of SHEP, such as secondary rotator cuff insufficiency, tuberosity dislocation or resorption and secondary glenoid wear, can be treated using a conversion or a change to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Joint ProsthesisShoulder FracturesHumansProsthesis DesignRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeHemiarthroplastyHumerusReverse shoulder arthroplastyRotator cuffShoulder

Identifiers

PMID35833975
OpenAlexW4285391055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.