Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833960›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Suprascapular nerve release does not provide additional benefits in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tzu-Hung Yang, Meng-Hao Lin, Liang-Tseng Kuo, Wei-Hsiu Hsu, Pei-An Yu, Chi-Lung Chen, Yao-Hung Tsai

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tzu-Hung YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Meng-Hao LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Liang-Tseng KuoDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6 Western Sec., Chia-Pu Road, Putzi City, Chiayi, 613, Taiwan. light71829@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-8396
Wei-Hsiu HsuDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6 Western Sec., Chia-Pu Road, Putzi City, Chiayi, 613, Taiwan.
Pei-An YuDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6 Western Sec., Chia-Pu Road, Putzi City, Chiayi, 613, Taiwan.
Chi-Lung ChenDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6 Western Sec., Chia-Pu Road, Putzi City, Chiayi, 613, Taiwan.
Yao-Hung TsaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the effect of suprascapular nerve release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

methodsThis systematic review was performed to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compared the outcomes of patients who did and did not receive suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for cohort study assessment. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (version 1.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. The primary outcomes were pain and shoulder function. The secondary outcome was the re-tear rate.

resultsTwo RCTs and three non-RCTs with a total of 187 patients (90 patients received SSNR and 97 patients did not receive SSNR) were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that the SSNR group did not had a more pain reduction, assessed by visual analogue scale, compared to the non-SSNR group. Also, the SSNR group did not have a significantly more improvement in the UCLA score, compared to the non-SSNR group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Constant score and re-tear rate.

conclusionsThe result of this study showed that additional suprascapular nerve release did not provide additional benefit in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Routine arthroscopic SSNR is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesShoulderArthroscopyHumansPainRotator CuffRuptureArthroscopic rotator cuff repairMeta-analysisSuprascapular nerve releaseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35833960
OpenAlexW4285386617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.