Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833941›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Enhanced mismatch negativity in harmonic compared with inharmonic sounds.

David Ricardo Quiroga-Martinez, Krzysztof Basiński, Jonathan Nasielski, Barbara Tillmann, Elvira Brattico, Fanny Cholvy, Lesly Fornoni, Peter Vuust, Anne Caclin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Musical harmony is processed during sleep: a proof-of-concept study.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David Ricardo Quiroga-MartinezHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-6395
Krzysztof BasińskiDivision of Quality of Life Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-3383
Jonathan NasielskiUniversity College Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Barbara TillmannLyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
Elvira BratticoCenter for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus, Denmark.
Fanny CholvyLyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
Lesly FornoniLyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
Peter VuustCenter for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne CaclinLyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many natural sounds have frequency spectra composed of integer multiples of a fundamental frequency. This property, known as harmonicity, plays an important role in auditory information processing. However, the extent to which harmonicity influences the processing of sound features beyond pitch is still unclear. This is interesting because harmonic sounds have lower information entropy than inharmonic sounds. According to predictive processing accounts of perception, this property could produce more salient neural responses due to the brain's weighting of sensory signals according to their uncertainty. In the present study, we used electroencephalography to investigate brain responses to harmonic and inharmonic sounds commonly occurring in music: Piano tones and hi-hat cymbal sounds. In a multifeature oddball paradigm, we measured mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a responses to timbre, intensity, and location deviants in listeners with and without congenital amusia-an impairment of pitch processing. As hypothesized, we observed larger amplitudes and earlier latencies (for both MMN and P3a) in harmonic compared with inharmonic sounds. These harmonicity effects were modulated by sound feature. Moreover, the difference in P3a latency between harmonic and inharmonic sounds was larger for controls than amusics. We propose an explanation of these results based on predictive coding and discuss the relationship between harmonicity, information entropy, and precision weighting of prediction errors.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMusicAcoustic StimulationBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryPitch PerceptionSoundamusiaauditory perceptionevent-related potentialsharmonicitypitch perception

Identifiers

PMID35833941
PMCPMC9543822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.