Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2022
Aflibercept Monotherapy or Bevacizumab First for Diabetic Macular Edema.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Intravitreous Aflibercept Versus Intravitreous Bevacizumab + Deferred Aflibercept for Treatment of Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema
Home Care Monitoring of Visual Acuity and OCT Versus Standard Hospital/Clinic Care Monitoring During Diabetic Macular Edema Management: A Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Patient Age with Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Trial
- Risk Factors for Meeting Criteria for Switching from Bevacizumab to Aflibercept When Treating Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Visual Acuity of < 20/40.Ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Response to anti-VEGF injections for diabetic macular edema among patients on chronic exogenous insulin therapy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Treatment-Emergent Epiretinal Membrane in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World OCT-Based Comparative Pharmacotherapy Study Across Intravitreal Agents-The TRIDENT-DME Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of real-life visual outcomes and treatment efficacy of diabetic macular edema in patients with type 2 diabetes.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection Transitions Across Bevacizumab, Biosimilar, and Branded Medications: The IRIS Registry Study.Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026Article
- Persistent Vision Loss of Eyes Lost to Follow-Up with Diabetic Macular Edema Receiving Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Agents in Diabetic Macular Edema.Cureus · 2026Review
- U.S. trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use from 2017-2023: An analysis of medicare, medicaid, and commercial insurance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Modulation of aqueous humor cytokine profile by faricimab in patients with diabetic macular edema.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Elucidate the quantitative early diagnostic indicators of mild chondromalacia patella: ratios of trochlear sulcus angle to patellar and trochlear widths.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes of early and deferred anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular oedema in patients with type 1 diabetes.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- "Real world outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab for persistent diabetic macular edema".International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Role of Intravitreal Triamcinolone in Diabetic Macular Edema: 12-Month Outcomes after Bevacizumab Failure.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Cross-species tropism of AAV.CPP.16 in the respiratory tract and its gene therapies against pulmonary fibrosis and viral infection.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of three loading doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Transforming retinal disease management through diabetes care.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in ophthalmology.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Review
- Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: structural and functional improvements.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn eyes with diabetic macular edema, the relative efficacy of administering aflibercept monotherapy as compared with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept if the eye condition does not improve sufficiently (a form of step therapy) is unclear.
methodsAt 54 clinical sites, we randomly assigned eyes in adults who had diabetic macular edema involving the macular center and a visual-acuity letter score of 24 to 69 (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity; Snellen equivalent, 20/320 to 20/50) to receive either 2.0 mg of intravitreous aflibercept or 1.25 mg of intravitreous bevacizumab. The drug was administered at randomization and thereafter according to the prespecified retreatment protocol. Beginning at 12 weeks, eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy if protocol-specified criteria were met. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity over the 2-year trial period. Retinal central subfield thickness and visual acuity at 2 years and safety were also assessed.
resultsA total of 312 eyes (in 270 adults) underwent randomization; 158 eyes were assigned to receive aflibercept monotherapy and 154 to receive bevacizumab first. Over the 2-year period, 70% of the eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy. The mean improvement in visual acuity was 15.0 letters in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and 14.0 letters in the bevacizumab-first group (adjusted difference, 0.8 letters; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 2.5; P = 0.37). At 2 years, the mean changes in visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness were similar in the two groups. Serious adverse events (in 52% of the patients in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and in 36% of those in the bevacizumab-first group) and hospitalizations for adverse events (in 48% and 32%, respectively) were more common in the aflibercept-monotherapy group.
conclusionsIn this trial of treatment of moderate vision loss due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula, we found no evidence of a significant difference in visual outcomes over a 2-year period between aflibercept monotherapy and treatment with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept in the case of suboptimal response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; Protocol AC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03321513.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.