Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833783›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

Manish A Shah, Kohei Shitara, Florian Lordick, Yung-Jue Bang, Niall C Tebbutt, Jean-Phillippe Metges, Kei Muro, Keun-Wook Lee, Lin Shen, Sergei Tjulandin and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02178956 (A Phase III Clinical Trial of BBI608 Plus Weekly Paclitaxel vs. Placebo Plus Weekly Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Advanced, Previously Treated Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02178956 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Clinical Trial of BBI608 Plus Weekly Paclitaxel vs. Placebo Plus Weekly Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Advanced, Previously Treated Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSumitomo Pharma America, Inc.Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled714ConditionsGastric Cancer, Gastroesophageal Junction CancerArmsBBI608, Paclitaxel, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. STAT3 signaling inhibitors for cancer treatment.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Potential anticancer effects and toxicity of flavones luteolin and apigeninJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.

Manish A ShahJoan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-9655
Kohei ShitaraDepartment of Immunology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine and Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East and the Department of Immunology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5196-3630
Florian LordickDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Leipzig, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Yung-Jue BangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-4597
Niall C TebbuttDepartment of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Jean-Phillippe MetgesDepartment of Medical Oncology, CHRU de Brest-Hopital Morvan, Arpego Network Brest, Bretagne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0728-0861
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5572-743X
Keun-Wook LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8491-703X
Lin ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-2922
Sergei TjulandinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Centre, Moscow, Russia.
John L HaysDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Naureen StarlingGastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden, London & Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1496-6792
Rui-Hua XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9771-8534
Keren SturtzWestern States Cancer Research NCORP, Denver, Colorado.
Marilyn FontaineSumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Cindy OhSumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-205X
Emily M BrooksSumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bo XuSumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Wei LiSumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chiang J LiBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura BorodyanskySumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Eric Van CutsemDepartment of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
AVEO Oncology (United States) · USAichi Cancer Center · JPAustin Health · AUBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCancer Research Center · USCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCornell University · USMinistry of Education · ETNagoya University Hospital · JPRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RUSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSun Yat-sen University · CNThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL

designIn the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

resultsOverall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade ≥3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively.

conclusionsAdding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

Identifiers

PMID35833783
PMCPMC9433958
OpenAlexW4281562566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.