Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833727›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2022

Barriers to obesity health care from GP and client perspectives in New Zealand general practice: A meta-ethnography review.

Kimberley Norman, Lynne Chepulis, Lisette Burrows, Ross Lawrenson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and enablers to effective weight management for people living with overweight and obesity: A rapid scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Barriers to obesity health care from GP and client perspectives in New Zealand general practice: A meta-ethnography review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberley NormanTe Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-5451
Lynne ChepulisTe Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Lisette BurrowsTe Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ross LawrensonTe Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
University of Waikato · NZWaikato District Health Board · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a complex international health concern affecting individual quality of life and contributing to an unsustainable strain on national health systems. General practice is positioned as best suited to deliver weight management health care, yet, obesity rates remain high suggesting barriers are experienced within this space. The aim of this review is to synthesize general practitioner and client perspectives of weight management to identify barriers experienced in New Zealand general practice. Six databases were searched resulting in eight articles being included in this review. This interpretive synthesis was guided by principles of meta-ethnography and grounded theory. Four overarching themes were identified from client and general practitioner perspectives: stigma, communication, inadequate health care (system limitations for general practitioners and lack of tailored advice for clients), and sociocultural influences. These four barriers were found to be interdependent, influencing each other outside the general practice context, highlighting the intersectionality of weight management health-care barriers and further complicating effective weight management within general practice. Clients reported wanting tailored, non-stigmatized, effective weight management health care, yet, general practitioners reported being ill-equipped to provide this due to barriers both within and outside the limits of their practice. General practice requires more systemic support to deliver effective weight management including public health campaigns and indigenous health information to reduce health inequities. An appraisal of general practice being "best suited" to deliver effective weight management health care that is culturally appropriate is urgently required to improve obesity related health outcomes in New Zealand.

Indexed as

General PracticeQuality of LifeAnthropology, CulturalDelivery of Health CareHumansNew ZealandObesitygeneral practiceobesity synthesis reviewprimary careweight management

Identifiers

PMID35833727
PMCPMC9540793
OpenAlexW4285494134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.