Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833203›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2022

Economic burden of severe asthma treatment: A real-life study.

Jesús López-Tiro, Angelica Contreras-Contreras, M Eunice Rodríguez-Arellano, Paula Costa-Urrutia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pediatric asthma specialist care utilization among marginalized children with poorly controlled asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. The role of ACT score in mepolizumab discontinuation.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Tezepelumab: a new option for the treatment of severe asthma].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Alexithymia and asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Review
  17. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesús López-TiroDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE, Mexico City, 01030, Mexico.
Angelica Contreras-ContrerasDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE, Mexico City, 01030, Mexico.
M Eunice Rodríguez-ArellanoGenomic Medicine Laboratory, Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE, Mexico City, 01030, Mexico.
Paula Costa-UrrutiaGenomic Medicine Laboratory, Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE, Mexico City, 01030, Mexico.
Institute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals with severe asthma represent 5%-10% of the general asthmatic population. Despite the use of biologic drugs during clinical management, inadequate control of the disease has translated into high economic impact. In Mexico, however, these costs have not yet been assessed Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 2018 and 2019 at Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE. The assessment of direct costs included pharmacological treatment, clinical tests, days of hospitalization, admissions to the emergency room, and scheduled consultations. The evaluation involved 2 groups of patients-with controlled severe asthma (CSA) and uncontrolled severe asthma (UCSA)-according to presence of exacerbations. Results: 60 patients (18-75 years old, 51 women) were included in the study. In 2018, 23 of them (38.3%) were categorized as belonging to the UCSA group; in 2019, 22 patients (36.7%) were in this condition (exacerbations: median = 1.5, maximum = 6). Of the 60 patients, 12 (20%) presented between 2 and 9 exacerbations in the study's two-year period (median = 3) after between 4 and 10 years (median = 7.8) of complementary anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapy with omalizumab. The cost for all patients in the 2018-2019 period was 993,289.60 USD. The mean cost per patient was higher for those with UCSA (16,392 USD) than for those with CSA (16,246 USD, p = 0.02). We found a positive association between cost and exacerbations, with an increase of 350 USD per exacerbation (p˂0.0001). Our results indicate that 62% of patients respond to complementary anti-IgE treatment, while 38%-and especially 20%-do not respond optimally to this treatment. Conclusions: Poor asthma control in this latter group of 38% of patients leads to lower quality of life and higher costs associated with pharmacological treatment.

Indexed as

Biological drugsCost estimationEconomic burdenReal-life studySevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID35833203
PMCPMC9260620
OpenAlexW4283795206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.