Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833200›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022

Intrafraction motion during radiotherapy of breast tumor, breast tumor bed, and individual axillary lymph nodes on cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Maureen L Groot Koerkamp, H J G Desirée van den Bongard, Marielle E P Philippens, Femke van der Leij, Stefano Mandija, Antonetta C Houweling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heart is a heavy burden: cardiac toxicity in radiation oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maureen L Groot KoerkampDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H J G Desirée van den BongardDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marielle E P PhilippensDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke van der LeijDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefano MandijaDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonetta C HouwelingDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: In (ultra-)hypofractionation, the contribution of intrafraction motion to treatment accuracy becomes increasingly important. Our purpose was to evaluate intrafraction motion and resulting geometric uncertainties for breast tumor (bed) and individual axillary lymph nodes, and to compare prone and supine position for the breast tumor (bed). Materials and methods: During 1-3 min of free breathing, we acquired transverse/sagittal interleaved 1.5 T cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast tumor (bed) in prone and supine position and coronal/sagittal cine MRI of individual axillary lymph nodes in supine position. A total of 31 prone and 23 supine breast cine MRI (in 23 women) and 52 lymph node cine MRI (in 24 women) were included. Maximum displacement, breathing amplitude, and drift were analyzed using deformable image registration. Geometric uncertainties were calculated for all displacements and for breathing motion only. Results: Median maximum displacements (range over the three orthogonal orientations) were 1.1-1.5 mm for the breast tumor (bed) in prone and 1.8-3.0 mm in supine position, and 2.2-2.4 mm for lymph nodes. Maximum displacements were significantly smaller in prone than in supine position, mainly due to smaller breathing amplitude: 0.6-0.9 mm in prone vs. 0.9-1.4 mm in supine. Systematic and random uncertainties were 0.1-0.4 mm in prone position and 0.2-0.8 mm in supine position for the tumor (bed), and 0.4-0.6 mm for the lymph nodes. Conclusion: Intrafraction motion of breast tumor (bed) and individual lymph nodes was small. Motion of the tumor (bed) was smaller in prone than in supine position.

Indexed as

Accelerated partial breast irradiationBreast MRIIntrafraction motionProneRegional lymph nodesSupine

Identifiers

PMID35833200
PMCPMC9271760
OpenAlexW4283806988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.