ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2022
Layer-specific Strain Analysis with Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking in Acute Myocarditis.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cannabidiol on myocardial recovery in patients with acute myocarditis: primary results of the ARCHER study.ESC heart failure · 2026Trial
- Dilated cardiomyopathy evaluation with Imagenomics: combining multimodal cardiovascular imaging and genetics.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Myocardial deformation in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: layer-specific cardiac MRI insights from a pediatric cohort.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Commentary: Peeking under the surface with multilayer strain in cardiac MRI.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Impact of cannabidiol on myocardial recovery in patients with acute myocarditis: Rationale & design of the ARCHER trial.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Value of Strain Parameters Across All 4 Cardiac Chambers in Patients With Acute Myocarditis With Varied Ejection Fraction: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking Approach.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance-based layer-specific strain in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Sex differences in left-ventricular strain in a murine model of coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis.iScience · 2023Article
- Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance follow-up of COVID-19 vaccine associated acute myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of layer-specific cardiac MRI feature-tracking (FT) strain analysis in patients with acute myocarditis. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients (mean age, 43 years ± 19 [SD]; 46 men) with clinically defined acute myocarditis and 42 healthy controls who underwent cardiac MRI from March 2014 to November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. FT-based left ventricular peak systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) were assessed at subendocardial, midmyocardial, and subepicardial layers. The 2018 Lake Louise criteria (LLC) were assessed. Patients with myocarditis were dichotomized into two groups: those with preserved and those with reduced ejection fraction. For statistical analysis, unpaired Results: GLS and GCS values of all layers (eg, midmyocardial GCS: -21.3% ± 5.5 vs -28.0% ± 4.3; Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of cardiac MRI FT strain was different between myocardial layers in acute myocarditis, with midmyocardial GCS and subepicardial GLS providing the highest diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.