Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Application of Ultrasound Microscopy-Guided Pediatric Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Anesthesia.
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block by Costoclavicular Space Approach: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Review
- Retracted: Clinical Application of Ultrasound Microscopy-Guided Pediatric Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Anesthesia.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to investigate the anesthetic effect and safety of the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in pediatric upper limb surgery, this study retrospectively analyzed the anesthetic effect of the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in pediatric upper limb surgery. From January 2016 to December 2017, 82 children undergoing upper limb surgery in hospital A were selected and randomly divided into two groups by the coin method, with 41 children in each group. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia and conventional anatomic localization brachial plexus block anesthesia were performed. The anesthetic drug dosage of sensory block at anesthesia completion time and motor block at onset time was compared between the two groups; the one-time puncture success rate and incidence of anesthesia complications were compared between the two groups (local anesthesia poisoning, nerve injury, pneumothorax, hematoma, and phrenic nerve palsy). The results showed that the anesthesia completion time in the study group was slightly longer than that in the control group. The sensory and motor block occurred earlier in the study group than in the control group. Low doses of narcotic drugs are used. The one-time puncture success rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group. The incidence of anesthesia complications was lower than that of the control group. The one-time puncture success rate was 92.8% in the study group and 75.7% in the control group. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia has a significant effect in pediatric upper limb surgery, which can improve the anesthetic effect and reduce the incidence of complications, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.