Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833071›Full record

Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Effect Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Agitation in Patients with Craniocerebral Injury by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Sparse Reconstruction Algorithm.

Xue Feng, Binbin Zhao, Yongqiang Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Dose on Reducing Delirium in Adults: An Indirect Comparison of Controlled Trials.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xue FengDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8837-1839
Binbin ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-1786
Yongqiang WangDepartment of Outpatient, Harbin Red Cross Central Hospital, Harbin 150076, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-5129
First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CNRed Cross Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative agitation of patients with craniocerebral injury was investigated based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the sparse reconstruction algorithm. Sixty patients with craniocerebral injury who underwent tracheal intubation and craniotomy hematoma removal under general anesthesia in hospital were selected as the research objects. Patients were randomly and averagely divided into the normal saline group (group A) and the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group (group B). DEX was added to patients in group A during anesthesia. Other operations in group B were the same as those in group A, where DEX needed to be used was replaced by an equal amount of the normal saline. All patients received the MRI examination, and the images were processed by using the sparse reconstruction algorithm. After the surgery, some indexes, such as hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure (MAP) and hear rate (HR)), the Riker sedation agitation score, the Ramsay sedation score, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score were recorded and compared. The results showed that the MRI image quality processed by sparse reconstruction algorithm was observably improved. After reconstruction, the sharpness of the image was significantly improved, and the distinction between lesions and tissues was also increased. The Riker sedation agitation score and the incidence of agitation in group A were greatly lower than those in group B (16% VS 76%,

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaDeliriumDexmedetomidineAlgorithmsAnesthesia, IntravenousBradycardiaChillsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMagnetic Resonance ImagingPostoperative Nausea and VomitingSaline SolutionDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesSaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID35833071
PMCPMC9246591
OpenAlexW4283360910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.