ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Recovery Effect between Lateral and Posterior Foraminoscopy and PELD in LDH Patients.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Recovery Effect between Lateral and Posterior Foraminoscopy and PELD in LDH Patients.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/6FA4E1BFBB47A70E2EA8CDB54A6F46
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to analyze the clinical efficacy and recovery of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated by lateral and posterior foraminoscopy and posterior approach foraminoscopy (PELD), the comparison of clinical efficacy and recovery effect between lateral and posterior foraminoscopy and PELD in LDH patients was conducted. A total of 96 LDH patients admitted to our hospital from July 2020 to July 2021 were selected, and the lateral and posterior foraminoscopy group and PELD group were, respectively, established according to different surgical intervention methods. The lateral posterior foraminoscopy group is treated with lateral posterior foraminoscopy intervention, and the PELD group is treated with posterior foraminoscopy intervention. The intraoperative and postoperative indicators of the two groups were observed, and the pain improvement, lumbar function, clinical efficacy, and incidence of adverse complications were compared between the two groups before and 3 months after surgery. The Spearman correlation coefficient is used to analyze the correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar function (ODI) score, and the incidence of complications. For patients with LDH in implementing lientang road intervertebral foramen mirror, the clinical efficacy of the intervertebral foramen to a rear mirror was more apparent. It demonstrates that the treatment can reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten hospitalization time, improve lumbar vertebral function, and reduce a patient's risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.