ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Study on Ultrasonographic Diagnosis and Postoperative Comprehensive Nursing of Rectal Cancer in Preoperative Staging.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound-guided resection and microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of novel phased health education in the management of anorectal care.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Retracted: Study on Ultrasonographic Diagnosis and Postoperative Comprehensive Nursing of Rectal Cancer in Preoperative Staging.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of ultrasonography in preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and to study the effect of psychological nursing and colostomy nursing in patients with rectal cancer after colostomy. In this study, a retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on 41 patients with colostomy after rectal cancer surgery who had been treated in a hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 and 41 patients who only had general nursing. By analysis, 42 cases were detected by TRUS. Ultrasonic stage (uT) was consistent with pathological stage (pT) in 32 cases, and the coincidence rate was 76%. The tumor length and short diameter measured by 0RUS were not significantly related to pT (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.