ArticlePeerJ2022
Multi-locus evaluation of gastrointestinal bacterial communities from
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity among isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius group from Pacific marine mammals of Southern California.PloS one · 2026Article
- Unraveling the gut microbiota of Mexican pinnipeds: the dominance of life histories over phylogeny.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Detection of human pathogenic bacteria in rectal DNA samples from Zalophus californianus in the Gulf of California, Mexico.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The gastrointestinal (GI) bacterial communities of sea lions described to date have occasionally revealed large intraspecific variability, which may originate from several factors including different methodological approaches. Indeed, GI bacterial community surveys commonly rely on the use of a single hypervariable region (HR) of Methods: We employed a Short MUltiple Regions Framework (SMURF) approach using the Ion 16S™ Metagenomic Kit. This kit provides different proprietary primers designed to target six HRs of the Results: As hypothesized, distinctive bacterial community profiles were observed for each analyzed HR. A higher number of bacterial taxa were detected with the V3 and V6-V7 regions. Conversely, the V8 and V9 regions were less informative, as we detected a lower number of taxa. The synergistic information of these HRs suggests that the GI microbiota of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.