Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

Towards Autonomous Robotic Biopsy-Design, Modeling and Control of a Robot for Needle Insertion of a Commercial Full Core Biopsy Instrument.

Seyed MohammadReza Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba Karbasi, Henrik Brun, Jim Tørresen, Ole Jacob Elle, Kim Mathiassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Targeting extrachromosomal DNA in human cancers.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Simple Frame-based Approach for MR Imaging-guided Abdominal Biopsy: Preliminary Evaluation in a Phantom Model.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-Complexity Robotic Device for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Needle Biopsy.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyed MohammadReza SajadiThe Research Group of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ROBIN), Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Seyed Mojtaba KarbasiThe Research Group of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ROBIN), Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik BrunThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jim TørresenThe Research Group of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ROBIN), Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ole Jacob ElleThe Research Group of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ROBIN), Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kim MathiassenDepartment of Technology Systems, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the design, control, and experimental evaluation of a novel fully automated robotic-assisted system for the positioning and insertion of a commercial full core biopsy instrument under guidance by ultrasound imaging. The robotic system consisted of a novel 4 Degree of freedom (DOF) add-on robot for the positioning and insertion of the biopsy instrument that is attached to a UR5-based teleoperation system with 6 DOF. The robotic system incorporates the advantages of both freehand and probe-guided biopsy techniques. The proposed robotic system can be used as a slave robot in a teleoperation configuration or as an autonomous or semi-autonomous robot in the future. While the UR5 manipulator was controlled using a teleoperation scheme with force controller, a reinforcement learning based controller using the Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm was developed for the add-on robotic system. The dexterous workspace analysis of the add-on robotic system demonstrated that the system has a suitable workspace within the US image. Two sets of comprehensive experiments including four experiments were performed to evaluate the robotic system's performance in terms of the biopsy instrument positioning, and the insertion of the needle inside the ultrasound plane. The experimental results showed the ability of the robotic system for in-plane needle insertion. The overall mean error of all four experiments in the tracking of the needle angle was 0.446°, and the resolution of the needle insertion was 0.002 mm.

Indexed as

autonomous systemdeep deterministic policy gradientmechanical designmedical roboticpercutaneou needle biopsyreinforcement learningrobot-assistedultrasound guided robotic biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35832930
PMCPMC9272465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.