Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832712›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022

Comparison of area under the curve in various models of diabetic rats receiving chronic medication.

Keng-Fan Liu, Chiang-Shan Niu, Jen-Chieh Tsai, Chao-Lin Yang, Wen-Huang Peng, Ho-Shan Niu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulatory Effects ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keng-Fan LiuSchool of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine Resources, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chiang-Shan NiuDepartment of Nursing, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.
Jen-Chieh TsaiDepartment of Medicinal Botanicals and Health Applications, Da-Yeh University, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Chao-Lin YangCollege of Biopharmaceutical and Food Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wen-Huang PengSchool of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine Resources, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ho-Shan NiuDepartment of Nursing, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWTzu Chi University · TWDayeh University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is widely used as a diagnostic tool for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in clinical settings and animal experiments. The area under the curve (AUC) is then developed to quantify the total increase in blood glucose during the OGTT. Similarly, attenuation of the increased AUC indicates the improvement of IGT in animals. Variations in fasting plasma glucose between individuals stimulate the development of incremental area under the curve (iAUC). However, the iAUC determined from subtracting the baseline value of fasting plasma glucose (similar to ΔAUC) has been challenged as problematic without evidence. Material and methods: We developed four different diabetic animal models. In each model, rats were treated with metformin, dapagliflozin, and insulin respectively for 1 week. OGTTs were performed after 7 days of the drug treatment. The acute blood glucose changes induced by one-time treatment of drugs were also compared. Results: After a daily application of each drug at an effective dose for 7 days, results indicated potency in the following order: insulin > dapagliflozin > metformin. This was determined by calculation using the AUC in all diabetic models. However, the order changed when using the calculation with iAUC. Additionally, signals were changed before the OGTT in each model that received repeated treatment of each drug. Notably, drug potency was shown to be the same in OGTT calculated from iAUC and AUC in diabetic rats receiving acute treatment. Conclusions: iAUC seems unsuitable for application in cases where subjects are receiving chronic medication(s).

Indexed as

area under the curvediabetic ratsimpaired glucose toleranceincremental area under curveoral glucose tolerance test

Identifiers

PMID35832712
PMCPMC9266878
OpenAlexW3000302862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.