Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant Causes an Unprecedented Surge in Children Hospitalizations and Distinct Clinical Presentation Compared to the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant.

Jessica Taytard, Blandine Prevost, Aurélie Schnuriger, Guillaume Aubertin, Laura Berdah, Lauren Bitton, Audrey Dupond-Athenor, Guillaume Thouvenin, Nadia Nathan, Harriet Corvol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica TaytardPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Blandine PrevostPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Aurélie SchnurigerSorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA), Inserm UMR_S938, Paris, France.
Guillaume AubertinPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Laura BerdahPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Lauren BittonPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Audrey Dupond-AthenorPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Guillaume ThouveninPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Nadia NathanPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Harriet CorvolPediatric Pulmonology Department, APHP Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the midst of successive waves of SARS-CoV-2 variants, the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant has recently caused a surge in pediatric infections and hospitalizations. This study aimed to describe and compare the symptoms, explorations, treatment and evolution of COVID-19 in hospitalized children during the successive B.1.617.2 (delta) and B.1.1.529 (omicron) waves. Methods: This observational study was performed in the Pediatric Pulmonology Department of a University Hospital in Paris, France. All hospitalized children aged between 0 and 18 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal swabs from July 15th to December 15th 2021 (delta wave), and from December 15th 2021 to February 28th 2022 (omicron wave) were included. Results: In total, 53 children were included, 14 (26.4%) during the delta wave and 39 (73.6%) during the omicron wave (almost three times as many hospitalizations in half the time during the latter wave). During the omicron wave, hospitalized patients were mostly aged < 5 years (90 vs. 71% of all the children during omicron and delta waves, respectively), and tended to have fewer underlying conditions (56 vs. 79% during omicron and delta waves, respectively, Conclusion: The dramatic increase in the hospitalization of children with COVID-19 and the modification of the clinical presentation between the latest delta and omicron waves require pediatricians to remain vigilant. It should also encourage caregivers to ensure vaccination in children older than 5 years, for whom the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has been deemed safe, immunogenic, and effective.

Indexed as

childrenCOVID-19delta varianthospitalizationomicron variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35832582
PMCPMC9271577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.