ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Effect of Radical Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery on Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Nursing Care for the Treatment of Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Retracted: Effect of Radical Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery on Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-01-11Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system in the clinic. It has multiple lesions, easy recurrence, easy metastasis, poor prognosis, and high mortality. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) on the surgical outcome, complications, and prognosis of elderly patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: One hundred elderly bladder cancer patients who underwent surgery in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected for the retrospective study and were divided into 50 cases each in the ORC group and the LRC group according to the different surgical methods. The ORC group was treated with ORC, and the LRC group implemented LRC treatment. The differences in surgery, immune function, recent clinical outcomes, and complications between the two groups were observed and compared. Results: The mean operative time, mean intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rate, and transfusion volume of patients in the LRC group were statistically significant when compared to the ORC group. The differences in the meantime to resume eating, time to get out of bed, mean number of days in hospital after surgery, and the amount of postoperative numbing analgesics used by patients in the LRC group after surgery were statistically significant compared to the ORC group ( Conclusion: LRC has less surgical trauma and intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications, providing some reference for clinical surgery for elderly bladder cancer patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.