ReviewJournal of heat transfer2019
Diffusive Transport in the Vitreous Humor: Experimental and Analytical Studies.
Review in Journal of heat transfer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental and mathematical approaches for drug delivery for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Review
- Mathematical Model of Macromolecular Drug Transport in a Partially Liquefied Vitreous Humor.Journal of heat transfer · 2022Article
- Analytical and Computational Modeling of Sustained-Release Drug Implants in the Vitreous Humor.Journal of heat transfer · 2021Article
- In Vivo Experimental and Analytical Studies for Bevacizumab Diffusion Coefficient Measurement in the Rabbit Vitreous Humor.Journal of heat transfer · 2021Article
- MEASUREMENT OF THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF THE VITREOUS HUMOR.Journal of porous media · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In relation to intravitreal drug delivery, predictive mathematical models for drug transport are being developed, and to effectively implement these for retinal delivery, the information on biophysical properties of various ocular tissues is fundamentally important. It is therefore necessary to accurately measure the diffusion coefficient of drugs and drug surrogates in the vitreous humor. In this review, we present the studies conducted by various researchers on such measurements over the last several decades. These include imaging techniques (fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) that make use of introducing a contrast agent or a labeled drug into the vitreous and tracking its diffusive movement at various time points. A predictive model for the same initial conditions when matched with the experimental measurements provides the diffusion coefficient, leading to results for various molecules ranging in size from approximately 0.1 to 160 kDa. For real drugs, the effectiveness of this system depends on the successful labeling of the drugs with suitable contrast agents such as fluorescein and gadolinium or manganese so that fluorescence or MR imagining could be conducted. Besides this technique, some work has been carried out using the diffusion apparatus for measuring permeation of a drug across an excised vitreous body from a donor chamber to the receptor by sampling assays from the chambers at various time intervals. This has the advantage of not requiring labeling but is otherwise more disruptive to the vitreous. Some success with nanoparticles has been achieved using dynamic light scattering (DLS), and presently, radioactive labeling is being explored.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.