Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832506›Full record

ArticleActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2022

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuromuscular rehabilitation setting. Part 2: patients and families' views on the received health care during the pandemic.

Lorenza Magliano, Giulia Citarelli, Maria Grazia Esposito, Vito Torre, Luisa Politano

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenza MaglianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Giulia CitarelliAssociazione Centro "Gaetano Torre" per Le Malattie Muscolari, Unità di Ricerca, Naples, Italy.
Maria Grazia EspositoAssociazione Centro "Gaetano Torre" per Le Malattie Muscolari, Unità di Ricerca, Naples, Italy.
Vito TorreAssociazione Centro "Gaetano Torre" per Le Malattie Muscolari, Unità di Ricerca, Naples, Italy.
Luisa PolitanoAssociazione Centro "Gaetano Torre" per Le Malattie Muscolari, Unità di Ricerca, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0925-7158
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored views of users with muscular dystrophies and their caregivers on staff-user relationships and the treatments provided by a Rehabilitation Centre during the pandemic. Patients and relatives were asked to anonymously complete an open-ended questionnaire exploring their views on these aspects. Fifty-four patients and 40 caregivers gave their informed consent and participated in the survey. Fifty-three patients were adults, 28% suffering from Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Patients reported 269 comments on health care services provided during the pandemic, 132 (49%) concerning positive aspects and 137 (51%) negative aspects. The prompt restart of the rehabilitation therapies and the staff closeness over the pandemic were the practical aspects most frequently appreciated (46.9%), while closer family contacts and the perception of being able to rely on the Centre's constant support were the most cited psychological aspects (53.1%). Architectural barriers, difficulties in accessing public health services, economic difficulties, and lack of support from welfare and other agencies were the practical critical points most frequently reported (89%). In addition, social isolation, and loneliness due to fear of contagion were the most negative psychological aspects (10.1%). As regard the caregivers' views, participants reported 151 comments. Of these, 86 (56.9%) were positive and 65 (43.1%) were negative. Among the positive aspects, the psychological ones - such as closer family contacts, not feeling abandoned and counting on the constant Centre's professional support prevailed (53.5%). As for the negative aspects, most caregivers (92.6%) believe that the pandemic exacerbated their financial and bureaucratic difficulties, particularly in poorer families.

Indexed as

COVID-19Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneAdultCaregiversDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsSocial Supportactivities of daily livingbenefits and difficultiesCOVID-19 pandemicmuscle diseasesrehabilitation setting

Identifiers

PMID35832506
PMCPMC9237748
OpenAlexW4285503272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.