ArticleDigital health
Frequent and diverse use of electronic health records in the United States: A trend analysis of national surveys.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital and Paper-Based Hospital Workflows and 60-Day Mortality in Acute Leukemia: Retrospective Natural Experiment.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Challenges of Electronic Medical Record Implementation From the Perspective of Hospital Leaders in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Public Hospitals:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Analysis of Patient Safety Event Report to Understand the Contribution of Health IT to Diagnostic Error.Journal of patient safety · 2026Article
- The Impact of Trust and the Role of the Opt-Out Mechanism in Willingness to Share Health Data via Electronic Health Records in Germany: Telephone Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Understanding patient perception of digital value co-creation in electronic health record through clustering approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nurses' Perception towards Electronic Medical Records System: An Integrative Review of Barriers and Facilitators.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Digital Health Technology Use Across Socioeconomic Groups Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Panel Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Online Patient Portal Utilization Experience in an Arkansas Phone Survey.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Exploring Functions and Predictors of Digital Health Engagement Among German Internet Users: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Japanese Consumers' Attitudes towards Obtaining and Sharing Health Information Regarding Over-the-Counter Medication: Designing an Over-the-Counter Electronic Health Record.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Technology adoption of electronic medical records in developing economies: A systematic review on physicians' perspective.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Considering the increasing integration of electronic health records (EHRs) into medical practice by healthcare organizations, it is especially pertinent to understand its actual usage by the general public in recent years. This study aims to explore factors associated with the frequency and diversity of EHR usage in the United States over time. Methods: We analyzed three iterations (2017, 2018, and 2019) of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). HINTS is a national cross-sectional survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute to document attitudes and perceptions about health information access and use among American adults. Results: Both frequency and diversity of EHR usage have slightly increased across the years. However, its overall usage still remained low. Three technology-related enablers (access to digital devices, access to the Internet, and perceived usefulness of EHRs) were positively related to EHR usage in all three iterations. In addition, perceived health status was a constant and negative predictor of EHR usage over years. Doctor-patient communication was positively associated with the frequency of EHR usage in two survey waves. Conclusions: More initiatives to increase EHR usage in the United States are needed. We advocate for providing affordable Internet access and smartphone to underserved populations; in medical encounters, doctors should have more patient-centered communication, introduce the benefits of EHRs to patients, and promote EHR adoption in terms of frequency and diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.