ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
A random forest algorithm predicting model combining intraoperative frozen section analysis and clinical features guides surgical strategy for peripheral solitary pulmonary nodules.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: From Early Detection to Personalized Therapy.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative atrial fibrillation in lung cancer patients based on multi-dimensional feature fusion and ensemble learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Effective analysis of job satisfaction among medical staff in Chinese public hospitals: a random forest model.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- A CT-based radiomics approach to predict immediate response of radiofrequency ablation in colorectal cancer lung metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis has been used to guide the extent of resection in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), but its accuracy varies greatly among different hospitals. Artificial intelligence (AI) and multidimensional data technology are developing rapidly these years, meanwhile, surgeons need better methods to guide the surgical strategy of SPNs. We established predicting models combining FS results with multidimensional perioperative clinical features using logistic regression analysis and the random forest (RF) algorithm to get more accurate extent of SPN resection. Methods: Patients with peripheral SPNs who underwent FS-guided surgical resection at the Shanghai Chest Hospital (January 2017-December 2018) were retrospectively examined (N=3,089). The accuracy of intraoperative FS-guided resection extent was analyzed and used as Model 1. The clinical features (sex, age, CT features, tumor markers, smoking history, lesion size and nodule location) of patients were collected, and Models 2 and 3 were established using logistic regression and RF algorithms to combine the FS with clinical features. We confirmed the performance of these models in an external validation cohort of 117 patients from Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science (Ningbo No. 2 Hospital). We compared the effectiveness in classifying low/high-risk groups of SPN among them. Results: The accuracy of FS analysis was 61.3%. Model 3 exhibited the best diagnostic accuracy and had an area under the curve of 0.903 in n the internal validation cohort and 0.919 in the external validation cohort. The calibration plots and net reclassification index (NRI) of Model 3 also exhibited significantly better performance than the other models. Improved diagnostic accuracy was observed in in both internal and external validation cohort. Conclusions: Using an RF algorithm, clinical characteristics can be combined with intraoperative FS analysis to significantly improve intraoperative judgment accuracy for low- and high-risk tumors, and may serve as a reliable complementary method when FS evaluation is equivocal, improving the accuracy of the extent of surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.