Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832349›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022

Artificial Intelligence Technology in Basketball Training Action Recognition.

Yao Cheng, Xiaojun Liang, Yi Xu, Xin Kuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yao ChengShaoxing University Yuanpei College, Shaoxing, China.
Xiaojun LiangCollege of Humanities, Zhaoqing Medical College, Zhaoqing, China.
Yi XuMinistry of Basic Education, Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China.
Xin KuangSchool of Management, Guang Dong AIB Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary research purpose lies in studying the intelligent detection of movements in basketball training through artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Primarily, the theory of somatosensory gesture recognition is analyzed, which lays a theoretical foundation for research. Then, the collected signal is denoised and normalized to ensure that the obtained signal data will not be distorted. Finally, the four algorithms, decision tree (DT), naive Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN), are used to detect the data of athletes' different limb movements and recall. The accuracy of the data is compared and analyzed. Experiments show that the back propagation (BP) ANN algorithm has the best action recognition effect among the four algorithms. In basketball training athletes' upper limb movement detection, the average accuracy rate is close to 93.3%, and the average recall is also immediate to 93.3%. In basketball training athletes' lower limb movement detection, the average accuracy rate is close to 99.4%, and the average recall is immediate to 99.4%. In the detection of movements of upper and lower limbs: the recognition method can efficiently recognize the basketball actions of catching, passing, dribbling, and shooting, the recognition rate is over 95%, and the average accuracy of the four training actions of catching, passing, dribbling, and shooting is close to 98.95%. The intelligent basketball training system studied will help basketball coaches grasp the skilled movements of athletes better to make more efficient training programs and help athletes improve their skill level.

Indexed as

accuracyartificial neural networkbasketball trainingrecallsomatosensory motion gesture recognition

Identifiers

PMID35832349
PMCPMC9272734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.