ReviewHeliyon2022
Smartphone-based wound dressings: A mini-review.
Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymer- and Lipid-Based Nanostructures for Wound Healing with Barrier-Resolved Design.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Smart Dressings for Combating Antibiotic Resistance in Wound Care.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Intelligent electrospinning nanofibrous membranes for monitoring and promotion of the wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Exploring Thermal Dynamics in Wound Healing: The Impact of Temperature and Microenvironment.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Review
- Wearable Smart Bandage-Based Bio-Sensors.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Pentoxifylline/Chitosan Films on Wound Healing: In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Review
- Innovation for infection prevention and control-revisiting Pasteur's vision.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In spite of remarkable progress in the field of wound curation, treatment of chronic wounds remains a challenge for medical services. The constant rise in the number of patients with chronic wounds and their related financial burden has caused concern for the healthcare system. The complicated and dynamic nature of chronic wounds has increased the curation time and difficulty of wound healing with conventional bandages. Efficient healing of these wounds requires new bandages with the ability of real-time monitoring, data analysis, and drug delivery, which protect the wound against infection and accelerate the treatment process. The recent development of smartphone applications and digital equipment in medicine provides an opportunity for significant improvement in wound care through the incorporation of "smart" technologies into clinical practice. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of the current status of smartphones and digital technology in the management of wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.