Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Cats Undergoing Resection of Intestinal Adenocarcinomas: 58 Cases (2008-2020).

Peter S Czajkowski, Nicola M Parry, Carrie A Wood, Sue A Casale, Whitney E Phipps, Jennifer A Mahoney, Daniel I Spector, Lori Lyn Price, John Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter S CzajkowskiFoster Hospital for Small Animals at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, United States.
Nicola M ParryVeterinary Pathology Center, University of Surrey School of Veterinary Medicine, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Carrie A WoodFoster Hospital for Small Animals at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, United States.
Sue A CasaleMassachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Angell Animal Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Whitney E PhippsPieper Veterinary Emergency and Specialty, Middletown, CT, United States.
Jennifer A MahoneyMatthew J. Ryan Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Daniel I SpectorSchwarzman Animal Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Lori Lyn PriceTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
John BergFoster Hospital for Small Animals at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, United States.
Tufts Children's Hospital · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMSPCA-Angell · USThe Schwarzman Animal Medical Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this multi-institutional retrospective study was to expand the available data pertaining to pre-operative clinical findings, progression-free and overall survival times, and potential prognostic factors for cats undergoing surgery for intestinal adenocarcinomas. Fifty-eight cats treated over a 12-year period were included in the study. Progression-free and overall survival times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Potential prognostic variables were evaluated for associations with progression-free and overall survival using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Prior to surgery, the intestinal mass was identified using ultrasonography in 89% of cats in which it was applied; however, imaging findings suggestive of intrathoracic metastases were observed in only 9% of cats. Among 22 cats undergoing ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology, the results agreed with the results of histopathology in only 10 cats. Discordant results were most commonly related to the presence of marked inflammation in cytology samples, which may have obscured the presence of neoplastic cells. Diffuse intestinal small cell lymphoma was identified as a comorbidity in 5 cats. Resection of the tumor with the objective of obtaining wide surgical margins was performed in each cat. On histopathology, 20 tumors were classified as mucinous adenocarcinoma and 28 were adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Intestinal transection site margins were complete in 94% of cats; however, complete mural margins were present in only 15% of cats. Local lymph node metastases were identified in 52% of cats and carcinomatosis was diagnosed in 81% of cats. Disease progression was documented in 32 of the 58 cats (55%). Of these 32 cats, 14 (43%) had local recurrence of the primary intestinal tumor. Median progression-free survival was 203 days (95% CI 130-299 days), and median overall survival time was 284 days (95% CI 200-363 days). Mitotic count was inversely associated with progression-free survival (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07,

Indexed as

carcinomatosisfeline intestinal adenocarcinomafeline surgeryintestinal carcinomaoncologic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35832326
PMCPMC9271912
OpenAlexW4283593142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.