Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832284›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Marital Status and Gender Differences as Key Determinants of COVID-19 Impact on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction and Resilience in Health Care Workers and Staff Working in Academia in the UK During the First Wave of the Pandemic.

Junjie Peng, Wing Han Wu, Georgia Doolan, Naila Choudhury, Puja Mehta, Ayesha Khatun, Laura Hennelly, Julian Henty, Elizabeth C Jury, Lih-Mei Liao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic on women's mental health: empirical evidence from Vietnam.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Life Satisfaction Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand.International journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Junjie PengDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wing Han WuDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Georgia DoolanDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naila ChoudhuryMedical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Puja MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Inflammation and Tissue Repair, University College London Respiratory, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ayesha KhatunDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura HennellyDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Julian HentyDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, St Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth C JuryDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lih-Mei LiaoWomen's Health Psychological Services, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Coziana CiurtinDivision of Medicine, Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthVersus Arthritis 22203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented global public health crisis that continues to exert immense pressure on healthcare and related professional staff and services. The impact on staff wellbeing is likely to be influenced by a combination of modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the self-reported wellbeing, resilience, and job satisfaction of National Health Service (NHS) and university staff working in the field of healthcare and medical research. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional survey of NHS and UK university staff throughout the COVID-19 pandemic between May-November 2020. The anonymous and voluntary survey was disseminated through social media platforms, and via e-mail to members of professional and medical bodies. The data was analyzed using descriptive and regression (R) statistics. Results: The enjoyment of work and satisfaction outside of work was significantly negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic for all of staff groups independent of other variables. Furthermore, married women reporting significantly lower wellbeing than married men ( Conclusion: Our study confirms that the enjoyment of work and general satisfaction of staff members has been significantly affected by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, being married appears to be a protective factor for wellbeing and resilience but the effect may be reversed for life satisfaction outside work. Our survey highlights the critical need for further research to examine gender differences using a wider range of methods.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMarital StatusSex FactorsState MedicineUnited KingdomCOVID-19 pandemic in the UKhealth care workersjob satisfactionresiliencewellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35832284
PMCPMC9271694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.