Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832158›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2022

Clinical Assessment of Pain and Sensory Function in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Recovery: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Albin A John, Stephen Rossettie, John Rafael, Cameron T Cox, Ivica Ducic, Brendan J Mackay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albin A JohnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-2956-4091
Stephen RossettieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5422-637X
John RafaelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6053-5520
Cameron T CoxDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-0026-9272
Ivica DucicWashington Nerve Institute, McLean, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-4135
Brendan J MackayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-2857
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) often present with variable symptoms, making them difficult to diagnose, treat, and monitor. When neurologic compromise is inadequately assessed, suboptimal treatment decisions can result in lasting functional deficits. There are many available tools for evaluating pain and functional status of peripheral nerves. However, the literature lacks a detailed, comprehensive view of the data comparing the clinical utility of these modalities, and there is no consensus on the optimal algorithm for sensory and pain assessment in PNIs. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on clinical data, evaluating pain and sensory assessment methods in peripheral nerves. We searched through multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, to identify studies that assessed assessment tools and explored their advantages and disadvantages. A total of 66 studies were selected that assessed various tools used to assess patient's pain and sensory recovery after a PNI. This review may serve as a guide to select the most appropriate assessment tools for monitoring nerve pain and/or sensory function both pre- and postoperatively. As the surgeons work to improve treatments for PNI and dysfunction, identifying the most appropriate existing measures of success and future directions for improved algorithms could lead to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

peripheral nerve injuriesperipheral nervesrecovery of functionsensationtreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35832158
PMCPMC9142258
OpenAlexW4281760446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.