ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022
Overall and stage-specific survival of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer in European countries: A population-based study in 9 countries.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Fecal DNA SDC2 methylation test for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and concentrative nucleoside transporter 1 in colorectal cancer: What do we know? A systematic review.Histology and histopathology · 2025Pooled it
- Proportion of Screen-Detected Gastrointestinal Cancers From the National Cancer Registry in Japan.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Mailed faecal immunochemical test programmes and educational inequalities in colorectal cancer screening in Europe: a difference-in-differences analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Low Muscle Density Is Associated with Morbidity and Systemic Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer, Independent of Tumor Factors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Differential Expression and Co-Variation of HERV-Associated Transcripts, IL-17 Cytokines, and NFκB in Paired Colorectal Cancer Tissues.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of gut microbiome for non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- BMX-001 acts as a selective chemoradioprotector in rectal cancer.Redox biochemistry and chemistry · 2026Article
- UK National Screening Committee position statement on surrogate outcomes in cancer screening trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Article
- Late effects among colorectal cancer survivors ≥5 years after diagnosis-a systematic scoping review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Expert opinion on treatment patterns in metastatic colorectal cancer management in Eastern Europe.BMC proceedings · 2026Article
- Oralcanreg registry: development and evaluation of an oral and lip squamous cell cancer registry.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national trends in colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2021: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in identifying early rectal cancers suitable for endoscopic intermuscular dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Real-World Molecular Testing in European Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- A standardized robot-assisted technique for giant paraesophageal hernia repair: the relationship between surgical details and low recurrence rate in long-term follow-up.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Observational
- Colorectal Cancer at the Crossroads: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of Platinum-Based Drugs.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Intensive care unit outcomes and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The prognostic potential of RNA in stage II colon cancer: Insights from a screened multicenter population-based cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway attenuates the metastatic potential of colorectal carcinoma circulating tumor cells in a murine xenotransplantation model.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An increasing proportion of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are detected through screening due to the availability of organised population-based programmes. We aimed to analyse survival probabilities of patients with screen-detected CRC in European countries. Methods: Data from CRC patients were obtained from 16 population-based cancer registries in nine European countries. We included patients with cancer diagnosed from the year organised CRC screening programmes were introduced until the most recent year with available data at the time of analysis, whose ages at diagnosis fell into the age groups targeted by screening. Patients were followed up with regards to vital status until 2016-2020 across the various countries. Overall and CRC-specific survival were analysed by mode of detection and stage at diagnosis for all countries combined and for each country separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. Findings: We included data from 228 134 patients, of whom 134 597 (aged 60-69 years at diagnosis targeted by screening in all countries) were considered in analyses for all countries combined. 22·3% (38 080/134 597) of patients had cancer detected through screening. Most screen-detected cancers were found at stages I-II (65·6% [12 772/19 469 included in stage-specific analyses]), while the majority of non-screen-detected cancers were found at stages III-IV (56·4% [31 882/56 543 included in stage-specific analyses]). Five-year overall and CRC-specific survival rates for patients with screen-detected cancer were 83·4% (95% CI 82·9-83·9) and 89·2% (88·8-89·7), respectively; for patients with non-screen-detected cancer, they were much lower (57·5% [57·2-57·8] and 65·7% [65·4-66·1], respectively). The favourable survival of patients with screen-detected cancer was also seen within each stage - five-year overall survival rates for patients with screen-detected stage I, II, III, and IV cancers were 92.4% (95% CI 91·6-93·1), 87·9% (86·6-89·1), 80·7% (79·3-82·0), and 32·3 (29·4-35·2), respectively. These patterns were also consistently seen for each individual country. Interpretation: Patients with cancer diagnosed at screening have a very favourable prognosis. In the rare case of detection of advanced stage cancer, survival probabilities are still much higher than those commonly reported for all patients regardless of mode of detection. Although these results cannot be taken to quantify screening effects, they provide useful and encouraging information for patients with screen-detected CRC and their physicians. Funding: This study was supported in part by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the German Cancer Aid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.