Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831919›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2022

Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study.

Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Andrés Catena, Mario Pérez-Sayáns, Juan Emilio Fernández-Barbero, Francisco O'Valle, Miguel Padial-Molina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Scientific evaluation of design and surface advances in Straumann implants.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026
    Article
  20. Observational

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo Galindo-MorenoDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470
Andrés CatenaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0775-5751
Mario Pérez-SayánsOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-9868
Juan Emilio Fernández-BarberoDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine & IBIMER, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-4973
Francisco O'ValleDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine & IBIMER, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287
Miguel Padial-MolinaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to establish an objective criterion in terms of marginal bone level (MBL) to know the prognosis of an implant. MATERIALS AND

methodsA group of 176 patients in whom 590 implants were placed were included in this retrospective study. Patients older than 18 years, presenting either Kennedy class I or II edentulous section, or totally edentulous at least in one of the dental arches were included in this study. Those with any type of disturbance able to alter bone metabolism or with nontreated periodontal disease were excluded. Data on radiographic MBL at loading, 6 and 18 months later, age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontitis, bone substratum, implant, and prosthetic features were recorded. Nonparametric receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed for the MBL at 18 months in order to establish a distinction among high bone loser (HBL) and low bone loser (LBL) implants. Differences as a function of main variables were also determined, particularly abutment height and periodontal disease.

resultsHBL implants lost at least 0.48 mm of MBL 6 months after loading; they reached at least 2 mm of MBL 18 months after loading. MBL rate followed a nonlinear trend, except in implants restored over long prosthetic abutments and in patients with history of severe periodontitis; in whom the rate of MBL over the time was nearly zero.

conclusionImplants that lose more than 0.5 mm of marginal bone 6 months after loading are at great risk of not being radiographically successful anymore. Therefore, 0.5 mm of MBL is proposed as a distinctive and objective criterion of success in Implant Dentistry within a 6-month follow-up period. A prosthetic abutment height ≥2 mm resulted the most protective factor in the peri-implant bone maintenance.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossBone Diseases, MetabolicDental ImplantsPeriodontal DiseasesPeriodontitisDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansRetrospective StudiesDental Implantsalveolar bone lossdental implantsmarginal bone lossperi-implantitisperiodontitisprosthetics

Identifiers

PMID35831919
PMCPMC9796358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.