Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831897›Full record

ReviewBMC psychology2022

Goal setting with young people for anxiety and depression: What works for whom in therapeutic relationships? A literature review and insight analysis.

Jenna Jacob, Milos Stankovic, Inga Spuerck, Farhad Shokraneh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differences in life projects among adolescents in situations of social vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Commentary: What young people want from psychotherapy.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna JacobChild Outcomes Research Consortium, Anna Freud Centre, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK. jenna.jacob@annafreud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-1547
Milos StankovicEuro Youth Mental Health, The Block, 35 Churchgate, Hitchin, SG5 1DN, UK.
Inga SpuerckEuro Youth Mental Health, The Block, 35 Churchgate, Hitchin, SG5 1DN, UK.
Farhad ShokranehSystematic Review Consultants, 9 Sandfield Road, Nottingham, NG7 1QR, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoal setting and goal-focused work is widely used in young people's mental health settings. However, little is known about how, why or for whom this is helpful. This study aims to explore the mechanisms of collaborative goal setting as part of therapeutic relationships: is it helpful for young people experiencing anxiety and/or depression, how and why/not, for whom, and under what circumstances?

methodsOnline database searches generated 10,907 records. Seven unique studies are included, combined with insight analysis from directed discussions with international advisors with lived experience of anxiety and/or depression and therapy (N = 8; mean age = 20.8), and mental health academics/clinicians (N = 6).

resultsFindings are presented as a narrative synthesis and suggest that goal setting is helpful to young people experiencing anxiety and/or depression because it helps build good therapeutic relationships through open communication and building trust. Goal setting helps make things more manageable, enabling young people to feel supported and have ownership of their care. Individual preferences, or high levels of distress, trauma, low confidence, hopelessness, negative past experiences of goal setting, perfectionism, and rumination are considered limiting factors to goal setting. Additionally, contextual factors including country and long-term therapy are explored.

conclusionWhilst the resultant sample is small, emphasis on the voices of young people in the research is both prominent and of paramount importance. Several key literature gaps are identified, including evidenced links to the reduction in symptoms. Priority must be given to researching unhelpful mechanisms of goal setting for young people experiencing anxiety and/or depression, to avoid any potential iatrogenic effects.

Indexed as

DepressionGoalsAdolescentAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansMental HealthYoung AdultActive ingredientsAnxietyDepressionGoal based outcomesGoal settingOutcome measurementTherapeutic allianceYouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID35831897
PMCPMC9281142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.