Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831827›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022

Oxygenation versus driving pressure for determining the best positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Saida Rezaiguia-Delclaux, Léo Ren, Aurélie Gruner, Calypso Roman, Thibaut Genty, François Stéphan

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A non-invasive diagnostic tool for the assessment of optimal positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEPJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saida Rezaiguia-DelclauxCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
Léo RenCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
Aurélie GrunerCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
Calypso RomanCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
Thibaut GentyCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
François StéphanCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis Robinson, France. f-stephan@hotmail.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to compare driving pressure and absolute PaO PATIENTS AND

methodsIn 122 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, PEEP was increased until plateau pressure reached 30 cmH MAIN

resultsThe best mean PEEP

conclusionDepending on the method chosen, the best PEEP level varies. The best PEEP CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: #ACTRN12618000554268 . Registered 13 April 2018.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesTidal VolumeAcute respiratory distress syndromeDriving pressureOxygenationPositive end-expiratory pressure

Identifiers

PMID35831827
PMCPMC9281138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.