Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831818›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Methods for conducting trends analysis: roadmap for comparing outcomes from three national HIV Population-based household surveys in Kenya (2007, 2012, and 2018).

Thomas Achia, Ismael Flores Cervantes, Paul Stupp, Paul Musingila, Jacques Muthusi, Anthony Waruru, Mary Schmitz, Megan Bronson, Gregory Chang, John Bore and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Thomas AchiaDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya. yrb2@cdc.gov.
Ismael Flores Cervantes, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Paul StuppDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Paul MusingilaDivision of Global HIV and TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jacques MuthusiDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anthony WaruruDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary SchmitzDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Megan BronsonDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gregory ChangDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John BoreKenya National Bureau of Statistics, Nairobi, Kenya.
Leonard KingwaraNational AIDS and STI Control Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel MwaliliDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Jomo Kenyatta University, Juja, Kenya.
James MuttungaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joshua GitongaNational AIDS Control Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kevin M De CockDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Peter YoungDivision of Global HIV & TB, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor assessing the HIV epidemic in Kenya, a series of independent HIV indicator household-based surveys of similar design can be used to investigate the trends in key indicators relevant to HIV prevention and control and to describe geographic and sociodemographic disparities, assess the impact of interventions, and develop strategies. We developed methods and tools to facilitate a robust analysis of trends across three national household-based surveys conducted in Kenya in 2007, 2012, and 2018.

methodsWe used data from the 2007 and 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator surveys (KAIS 2007 and KAIS 2012) and the 2018 Kenya Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (KENPHIA 2018). To assess the design and other variables of interest from each study, variables were recoded to ensure that they had equivalent meanings across the three surveys. After assessing weighting procedures for comparability, we used the KAIS 2012 nonresponse weighting procedure to revise normalized KENPHIA weights. Analyses were restricted to geographic areas covered by all three surveys. The revised analysis files were then merged into a single file for pooled analysis. We assessed distributions of age, sex, household wealth, and urban/rural status to identify unexpected changes between surveys. To demonstrate how a trend analysis can be carried out, we used continuous, binary, and time-to-event variables as examples. Specifically, temporal trends in age at first sex and having received an HIV test in the last 12 months were used to demonstrate the proposed analytical approach. These were assessed with respondent-specific variables (age, sex, level of education, and marital status) and household variables (place of residence and wealth index). All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4, but analysis files were created in Stata and R format to support additional analyses.

resultsThis study demonstrates trends in selected indicators to illustrate the approach that can be used in similar settings. The incidence of early sexual debut decreased from 11.63 (95% CI: 10.95-12.34) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2007 to 10.45 (95% CI: 9.75-11.2) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2012 and to 9.58 (95% CI: 9.08-10.1) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2018. HIV-testing rates increased from 12.6% (95% CI: 11.6%-13.6%) in 2007 to 56.1% (95% CI: 54.6%-57.6%) in 2012 but decreased slightly to 55.6% [95% CI: 54.6%-56.6%) in 2018. The decrease in incidence of early sexual debut could be convincingly demonstrated between 2007 and 2012 but not between 2012 and 2018. Similarly, there was virtually no difference between HIV Testing rates in 2012 and 2018.

conclusionsOur approach can be used to support trend comparisons for variables in HIV surveys in low-income settings. Independent national household surveys can be assessed for comparability, adjusted as appropriate, and used to estimate trends in key indicators. Analyzing trends over time can not only provide insights into Kenya's progress toward HIV epidemic control but also identify gaps.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaRural PopulationSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesClusteringHIVMultistage samplingStratificationSurvey designSurvey weightsTrends

Identifiers

PMID35831818
PMCPMC9281165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.