Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831786›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Preferences of women with a vulnerable health status towards nudging for adequate pregnancy preparation as investment in health of future generations: a qualitative study.

Sharissa M Smith, Rianne M J J van der Kleij, Babette Bais, Maartje H N Schermer, Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi, Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Maternal health agency in women with a low socioeconomic status: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sharissa M SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Rianne M J J van der KleijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Babette BaisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maartje H N SchermerDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi *Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. r.steegers@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

ZonMw 43003103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with a vulnerable health status, as determined by a low socioeconomic status and poor lifestyle behaviours, are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Offering tailored preconception lifestyle care can significantly help to improve pregnancy outcomes. We hypothesize that so-called 'nudges' can be a successful way of increasing the uptake of preconception lifestyle care. A nudge is a behavioural intervention that supports healthy choices by making them easier to choose. Nudging, however, raises many moral questions. Effectiveness and respect for autonomy are, among other criteria, required for a nudge to be morally permissible. In general, the target group knows best what they find permissible and what would motivate them to change their lifestyle. Therefore, this study - conducted in women with a vulnerable health status - aimed to identify their preferences towards a nudge, provided via a mobile application that aims to help them adopt healthy lifestyle behaviours by offering rewards. 

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve women with a vulnerable health status. A framework approach was used to analyse the data. A thematic content analysis was conducted on five themes: (1) "Usefulness of an app as an integral information source", (2) "Permissibility and effects of offering rewards", (3) "Preferences regarding content", (4) "Preferences regarding type of rewards and system of allocation", and (5) "Barriers".

resultsOf the 12 participants, 11 deemed an app as integral information source concerning the preconception period useful. None of the participants objected to being nudged i.e., being rewarded for healthy behaviour. All participants stated that they would like the app to contain information on healthy nutrition and 8 participants wanted to know how to get pregnant quickly. Furthermore, participants stated that the freedom to choose the timing and content of the reward would increase the probability of successful behavioural change, and having to pay or contact a healthcare provider to access the app may prevent women using the app.

conclusionsThese insights into the preferences of women with a vulnerable health status towards nudging will inform the design of an effective app-based nudge. This may help to improve prepregnancy health as investment in health of current and future generations.

Indexed as

Healthy LifestylePreconception CareFemaleHealth StatusHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocial ResponsibilityEthicsLife courseLifestyleNudgePreconception careRewardsSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID35831786
PMCPMC9281116
OpenAlexW4285088207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.